Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary vs Grattan Elementary
Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary and Grattan Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 8.9 out of 10. In math proficiency, Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary leads at 70.0%.
Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary
San Francisco, CA
589 students
Grattan Elementary
San Francisco, CA
384 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary | Grattan Elementary |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 8.9 / 10 | 9.2 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 9.8 | 8.7 |
| Growth Score | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 36.2% | 14.6% |
| Environment Score | 6.3 | 9.0 |
| State Rank | #307 of 9,533 | #135 of 9,533 |
| State Percentile | 97th | 99th |
Test Scores
| Subject | Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary | Grattan Elementary |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 70.0% | 67.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 75.0% | 62.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary | Grattan Elementary |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Elementary School | Elementary School |
| Grades | Kindergarten – 8th | Kindergarten – 5th |
| Enrollment | 589 | 384 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 26.8:1 | 20.2:1 |
| Per-Pupil Spending | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 36.2% | 14.6% |
| Chronic Absenteeism | — | — |
| District | San Francisco Unified | San Francisco Unified |
| City | San Francisco | San Francisco |
Neighborhood
| Metric | San Francisco (94122) | San Francisco (94117) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $145,717 | $175,096 |
| Median Home Value | $1,507,100 | $1,641,400 |
| Median Rent | $2,720 | $2,786 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 62.9% | 78.3% |
| Poverty Rate | 8.0% | 8.4% |
| Avg Commute | 32 min | 32 min |
The data story: Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary vs Grattan Elementary
Grattan Elementary edges Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary by 0.1 overall rating points — 9.2 versus 9.1 on a 10-point scale — but the state rank gap is more telling: Grattan Elementary sits at #179 of 9,533 California schools while Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary ranks #252 of 9,533. Both schools clear the top 3% statewide, making this a genuine choice between two high-performing programs rather than a clear quality divide.
The sharpest academic split runs in Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary's favor. Its academic score of 9.8/10 outpaces Grattan Elementary's 8.7/10 by 1.1 points — a meaningful delta when academic proficiency is the primary lens. Growth scores are identical: both schools earn 9.5/10, meaning students at each campus make comparable year-over-year learning gains regardless of where they start.
The demographic and classroom-environment differences are equally concrete. Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary enrolls 589 students against Grattan Elementary's 384, and its student-teacher ratio of 26.8:1 is notably wider than Grattan Elementary's 20.2:1. Free and reduced-price lunch eligibility stands at 36% at Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary versus 15% at Grattan Elementary, reflecting a broader socioeconomic mix at the larger school.
One structural difference shapes the long-term decision: Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary serves grades KG–08, keeping students through middle school without a transition, while Grattan Elementary covers only KG–05. Families choosing Grattan Elementary will need to identify a middle school placement at the end of fifth grade. The two campuses sit 1.1 miles apart in San Francisco, so proximity rarely decides the call on its own.
Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary
Yu (Alice Fong) Elementary suits families who prioritize raw academic proficiency — its 9.8/10 academic score is 1.1 points above Grattan's — and want a single school to carry their child from kindergarten through eighth grade, avoiding a mid-elementary transition. The larger enrollment and higher FRL rate also mean a more socioeconomically diverse peer environment.
Grattan Elementary
Grattan Elementary suits families who want smaller class sizes — 20.2:1 versus 26.8:1 at Yu — and a tighter-knit campus of 384 students. Its #179 California rank tops Yu's #252, and the KG–05 structure fits parents who plan to reassess middle school options intentionally rather than defaulting to a K–8 pathway.