Skip to main content

Douglass Elementary School vs Creekside Elementary School at Martin Park

Creekside Elementary School at Martin Park has a higher overall rating of 9.3/10 compared to 8.1/10. In math proficiency, Douglass Elementary School leads at 99.5%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricDouglass Elementary SchoolCreekside Elementary School at Martin Park
Overall Rating8.1 / 109.3 / 10
Academic Score9.39.9
Growth Score7.39.5
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch11%29.1%
Environment Score8.58.1
State Rank#261 of 1,815#8 of 1,815
State Percentile86th100th

Test Scores

SubjectDouglass Elementary SchoolCreekside Elementary School at Martin Park
Math Proficiency99.5%82.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency98.0%82.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailDouglass Elementary SchoolCreekside Elementary School at Martin Park
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesPre-K – 5thPre-K – 5th
Enrollment319368
Student-Teacher Ratio17.7:116.0:1
Free/Reduced Lunch11.0%29.1%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)11.6%26.1%
DistrictBoulder Valley School District No. Re2Boulder Valley School District No. Re2
CityBoulderBoulder

Neighborhood

MetricBoulder (80303)Boulder (80305)
Median Household Income$77,344$120,933
Median Home Value$941,600$985,700
Median Rent$1,833$2,198
College Educated (Bachelor's+)78.9%82.5%
Poverty Rate23.6%12.6%
Avg Commute19 min21 min

The data story: Douglass Elementary School vs Creekside Elementary School at Martin Park

Creekside Elementary School at Martin Park ranks #17 of 1,815 Colorado schools, placing it 15 spots ahead of Douglass Elementary School, which comes in at #32 of 1,815 — both exceptional standings, but Creekside holds a clear edge in statewide competition. On the 10-point overall scale, Creekside scores 9.3 to Douglass's 9.1, a modest 0.2-point gap that understates the differences visible in the underlying category scores.

The academic and growth separations are sharper. Creekside Elementary School at Martin Park earns a 9.9 academic score versus 9.3 for Douglass Elementary School — a 0.6-point delta that reflects meaningfully stronger proficiency outcomes. Growth follows the same direction: Creekside posts a 9.7 growth score against Douglass's 9.2, meaning students at Creekside are outpacing academic-progress expectations by a wider margin than their peers four miles away at Douglass.

The two schools diverge substantially on demographics. Creekside Elementary School at Martin Park enrolls 368 students with a free and reduced lunch rate of 29%, serving a notably broader socioeconomic range than Douglass Elementary School, where 319 students attend and only 11% qualify for FRL. Creekside also carries a more favorable student-teacher ratio — 16.0:1 versus Douglass's 17.7:1 — giving students slightly more individual instructional access despite its larger enrollment.

Both schools serve grades PK–05 and operate within the same Boulder Valley School District, making the comparison a direct apples-to-apples look within the same district framework. The structural similarities — grade span, district policies, calendar — mean the performance and demographic differences reflect school-level execution rather than program-type variation.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Douglass Elementary School

Douglass Elementary School suits families in the western Boulder corridors who prioritize a smaller, more homogeneous school community and are comfortable with a slightly less favorable student-teacher ratio in exchange for a well-established neighborhood school. Its #32 statewide rank still places it in the top 2% of Colorado elementaries — a strong choice for families where proximity matters more than maximizing academic metrics.

Creekside Elementary School at Martin Park

Creekside Elementary School at Martin Park is the stronger fit for families who weight academic output and student growth above all else, and who value a more economically diverse classroom environment. Its 9.9 academic score, 9.7 growth score, and 16.0:1 student-teacher ratio make it the higher-performing option by every measurable academic dimension — worth the extra commute for families willing to make the drive.

More Comparisons