Skip to main content

Katharine Lee Bates vs John D Hardy

John D Hardy has a higher overall rating of 9.8/10 compared to 9.3/10. In math proficiency, Katharine Lee Bates leads at 77.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricKatharine Lee BatesJohn D Hardy
Overall Rating9.3 / 109.8 / 10
Academic Score9.49.9
Growth Score9.09.6
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch0%0%
Environment Score9.89.9
State Rank#56 of 1,793#8 of 1,793
State Percentile97th100th

Test Scores

SubjectKatharine Lee BatesJohn D Hardy
Math Proficiency77.0%72.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency87.0%87.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailKatharine Lee BatesJohn D Hardy
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesKindergarten – 5thKindergarten – 5th
Enrollment253225
Student-Teacher Ratio13.3:111.8:1
Free/Reduced Lunch
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)6.3%8.4%
DistrictWellesleyWellesley
CityWellesleyWellesley

Neighborhood

MetricWellesley (02481)Wellesley (02482)
Median Household Income$250,001$240,069
Median Home Value$1,642,700$1,255,200
Median Rent$3,064$2,674
College Educated (Bachelor's+)90.1%83.5%
Poverty Rate2.7%4.0%
Avg Commute28 min31 min

The data story: Katharine Lee Bates vs John D Hardy

John D Hardy and Katharine Lee Bates are both exceptional elementary schools sitting 0.6 miles apart in Wellesley, Massachusetts, yet they are not identical. John D Hardy holds an overall rating of 9.5/10 versus Katharine Lee Bates at 9.2/10 — a 0.3-point gap that reflects a meaningful difference in how each school performs against state benchmarks. In absolute terms, John D Hardy ranks #9 of 1,791 schools in Massachusetts while Katharine Lee Bates ranks #31 — both elite, but Hardy sits 22 spots higher in a state with no shortage of strong elementary programs.

The academic score delta is the sharpest distinction between the two schools. John D Hardy scores 9.7/10 in academics against Katharine Lee Bates's 9.0/10 — a 0.7-point gap that signals consistently higher proficiency outcomes at Hardy. The growth picture flips: Katharine Lee Bates earns a 9.6/10 growth score compared to John D Hardy's 9.4/10, meaning Bates is pushing students forward at a marginally faster pace year over year. Families prioritizing current achievement levels will find Hardy's academic edge compelling; those who weight trajectory and instructional momentum may view Bates's growth advantage as the more predictive signal.

Katharine Lee Bates enrolls 253 students compared to John D Hardy's 225, a modest 28-student difference in a district where both schools are small by any measure. The more consequential gap is in student-teacher ratio: John D Hardy runs at 11.8 students per teacher versus 13.3 at Katharine Lee Bates. That 1.5-student difference per classroom compounds across a school day — Hardy families get meaningfully more individualized adult attention per child without leaving the same Wellesley zip code.

Both schools serve grades KG through 05, so neither offers a structural advantage in grade span. The comparison ultimately comes down to whether a family values Hardy's sharper academic scores and lower class sizes, or Bates's slightly stronger growth score and marginally larger peer community — two different expressions of excellence within a single high-performing district.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Katharine Lee Bates

John D Hardy suits families where demonstrated academic proficiency is the primary criterion — its 9.7/10 academic score and 11.8:1 student-teacher ratio make it the stronger fit for children who benefit from more direct teacher attention and for parents who want the top-ranked option within Wellesley's already exceptional elementary tier.

John D Hardy

Katharine Lee Bates suits families who prioritize learning velocity over static proficiency rankings. Its 9.6/10 growth score edges Hardy, signaling strong instructional momentum — a meaningful differentiator for students entering below grade level or for parents who believe growth trajectory better predicts long-term academic outcomes than a single-year proficiency snapshot.

More Comparisons

Compare Katharine Lee Bates with:

    Compare John D Hardy with: