Coolidge Elementary School vs Randolph Elementary School

Coolidge Elementary School and Randolph Elementary School are both strong performers in Livonia, Michigan, but Coolidge edges ahead overall — rating 9.5/10 against Randolph's 9.1/10, a 0.4-point gap. That margin becomes more significant in state context: Coolidge Elementary School ranks #14 of 3,190 schools in Michigan, while Randolph Elementary School ranks #51 of 3,190. Both sit in the top 2% of the state, but Coolidge's position is meaningfully higher for families where statewide standing matters.

The clearest academic difference sits in the academic score: Coolidge Elementary School scores 9.7/10 versus Randolph Elementary School's 8.7/10 — a full point separating them. That 10-point gap in academic proficiency is the largest delta between the two schools. Growth tells a different story entirely: both schools post identical growth scores of 9.6/10, meaning students at Randolph are advancing at the same pace as those at Coolidge once enrolled. Randolph's lower academic score reflects incoming proficiency levels more than classroom momentum.

On demographics and resources, the two schools are closely matched in size — Coolidge at 520 students, Randolph at 509 — but differ on two equity indicators. The free and reduced-price lunch rate at Randolph Elementary School is 39%, compared to 26% at Coolidge Elementary School, signaling that Randolph serves a broader range of economic backgrounds. The student-teacher ratio at Coolidge is 13.3:1 versus 14.5:1 at Randolph, giving Coolidge slightly smaller average class sizes and incrementally more individual attention per student.

Both schools serve grades KG through 04 and sit 4.6 miles apart within the same Livonia district, so curriculum frameworks and district-level programming are shared. Families weighing the two schools are not choosing between fundamentally different academic philosophies — the distinction comes down to current proficiency levels, class size, and the economic diversity of the student body. Neither school shows a growth advantage, so a student who transfers between them is unlikely to experience a different pace of academic progression.