PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE vs PS 250 GEORGE H LINDSAY
PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE has a higher overall rating of 8.4/10 compared to 4.9/10. PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE is significantly larger with 448 students, about 1.8× the size of PS 250 GEORGE H LINDSAY (256). In math proficiency, PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE leads at 92.0%.
PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE
Brooklyn, NY
448 students
PS 250 GEORGE H LINDSAY
Brooklyn, NY
256 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE | PS 250 GEORGE H LINDSAY |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 8.4 / 10 | 4.9 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 8.0 | 5.7 |
| Growth Score | 9.6 | 5.2 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 38.8% | 88.3% |
| Environment Score | 5.9 | 2.7 |
| State Rank | #367 of 4,742 | #3,628 of 4,742 |
| State Percentile | 92th | 24th |
Test Scores
| Subject | PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE | PS 250 GEORGE H LINDSAY |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 92.0% | 90.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 52.0% | 69.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE | PS 250 GEORGE H LINDSAY |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Elementary School | Elementary School |
| Grades | Pre-K – 5th | Pre-K – 5th |
| Enrollment | 448 | 256 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 38.8% | 88.3% |
| Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23) | 37.3% | 69.5% |
| District | NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #15 | NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #14 |
| City | Brooklyn | Brooklyn |
Neighborhood
| Metric | Brooklyn (11231) | Brooklyn (11206) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $138,485 | $57,280 |
| Median Home Value | $1,678,900 | $822,100 |
| Median Rent | $2,474 | $1,558 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 69.1% | 36.3% |
| Poverty Rate | 13.0% | 33.1% |
| Avg Commute | 36 min | 37 min |
The data story: PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE vs PS 250 GEORGE H LINDSAY
PS 32 Samuel Mills Sprole holds a 0.9-point overall rating advantage over PS 250 George H. Lindsay, scoring 8.5/10 against Lindsay's 7.6/10. That gap translates into a meaningful state rank difference: PS 32 sits at #275 of 4,742 New York schools, placing it in the top 6% statewide, while PS 250 ranks #1,081 of 4,742 — still comfortably above the midpoint but well behind Sprole in the state-wide field of elementary schools.
On academics, PS 32 Samuel Mills Sprole scores 8.6/10 versus PS 250 George H. Lindsay's 7.4/10 — a 1.2-point delta that signals a consistent and measurable proficiency advantage. Growth scores tell a different story: PS 250 George H. Lindsay edges ahead at 9.8/10 against Sprole's 9.6/10, meaning Lindsay is adding slightly more learning per year relative to student starting points. Both scores are exceptional, but parents weighing raw achievement against year-over-year momentum should note that Lindsay closes much of the gap when growth is the lens.
PS 32 Samuel Mills Sprole enrolls 448 students compared to PS 250 George H. Lindsay's 256, making Sprole a significantly larger school. Sprole's student-teacher ratio of 8.3:1 is notably lower than Lindsay's 10.2:1, giving Sprole students more face time per teacher despite the larger overall enrollment. The free and reduced-price lunch rates diverge sharply: 39% at PS 32 Samuel Mills Sprole versus 88% at PS 250 George H. Lindsay, reflecting substantially different socioeconomic compositions across these two Brooklyn campuses just 3.0 miles apart.
Both schools serve grades PK through 5, so families with children at either end of elementary school will find the same grade span at each site. The difference in free and reduced lunch eligibility — a 49-percentage-point spread — suggests that Lindsay serves a much higher concentration of economically disadvantaged families, a factor that makes Lindsay's strong 9.8/10 growth score particularly notable as an indicator of effective instruction under more challenging demographic conditions.
Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE
PS 32 Samuel Mills Sprole suits families prioritizing top-percentile academic achievement and low student-teacher ratios. At #275 statewide and an 8.6/10 academic score, it's the stronger choice for parents whose primary benchmark is proficiency and who want more adult attention per child in a larger, more resourced school environment.
PS 250 GEORGE H LINDSAY
PS 250 George H. Lindsay suits families who value demonstrated growth — its 9.8/10 growth score edges PS 32 — and those in the school's higher-need community who want a smaller, tightly knit campus of 256 students. It's also the right fit for families who prioritize a school that consistently moves students forward from wherever they start.