B. T. Washington High vs Hollis F. Price Middle College
Hollis F. Price Middle College has a higher overall rating of 5.0/10 compared to 4.2/10. B. T. Washington High is significantly larger with 454 students, about 4.3× the size of Hollis F. Price Middle College (105). In math proficiency, Hollis F. Price Middle College leads at 30.0%.
Attendance data is under correction. A public school's existing Resources & Environment score and overall rating shown here may still reflect an unverified attendance input.
B. T. Washington High
Memphis, TN
4.2/10
High School6th – 12th
454 students
Hollis F. Price Middle College
Memphis, TN
5.0/10
High School9th – 12th
105 students
Keep or send this comparison
Send to my realtor
Open an email to my realtorRatings Comparison
| Metric | B. T. Washington High | Hollis F. Price Middle College |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 4.2 / 10 | 5.0 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 1.7 | 5.0 |
| Growth Score | 2.6 | 1.1 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | — | — |
| Environment Score | 9.9 | 9.8 |
| State Rank | #1,613 of 1,790 | #1,396 of 1,790 |
| State Percentile | 10th | 22th |
Test Scores
| Subject | B. T. Washington High | Hollis F. Price Middle College |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 17.0% | 30.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 5.0% | 49.5% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | B. T. Washington High | Hollis F. Price Middle College |
|---|---|---|
| Type | High School | High School |
| Grades | 6th – 12th | 9th – 12th |
| Enrollment | 454 | 105 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 11.3:1 | 11.7:1 |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | — | — |
| Graduation Rate (4yr, Class of 2023) | 75–79% | 50%+ |
| District | Memphis-Shelby County Schools | Memphis-Shelby County Schools |
| City | Memphis | Memphis |
Neighborhood
| Metric | Memphis (38126) | Memphis (38126) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $30,825 | $30,825 |
| Median Home Value | $59,000 | $59,000 |
| Median Rent | $794 | $794 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 13.8% | 13.8% |
| Poverty Rate | 45.3% | 45.3% |
| Avg Commute | — | — |