Skip to main content

Trace Crossings Elementary School vs Gwin Elementary School

Gwin Elementary School has a higher overall rating of 9.4/10 compared to 8.7/10. In math proficiency, Trace Crossings Elementary School leads at 61.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Trace Crossings Elementary School Gwin Elementary School
Overall Rating 8.7 / 10 9.4 / 10
Academic Score 8.4 9.1
Growth Score 8.7 9.4
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 37.7% 46.7%
Environment Score 9.3 9.8
State Rank #79 of 1,356 #13 of 1,356
State Percentile 94th 99th

Test Scores

Subject Trace Crossings Elementary School Gwin Elementary School
Math Proficiency 61.0% 59.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 55.0% 52.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Trace Crossings Elementary School Gwin Elementary School
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 5th Pre-K – 5th
Enrollment 758 516
Student-Teacher Ratio 15.5:1 12.9:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 37.7% 46.7%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Hoover City Hoover City
City Hoover Hoover

Neighborhood

Metric Hoover (35244) Hoover (35226)
Median Household Income $114,172 $126,053
Median Home Value $390,900 $387,100
Median Rent $1,413 $1,467
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 60.1% 68.9%
Poverty Rate 3.8% 5.7%
Avg Commute 25 min 24 min

The data story: Trace Crossings Elementary School vs Gwin Elementary School

Gwin Elementary School and Trace Crossings Elementary School are both PK–5 schools in Hoover, Alabama, separated by 3.4 miles — but their standings in the state differ sharply. Gwin Elementary School ranks #14 of 1,356 schools in Alabama, while Trace Crossings Elementary School ranks #84 of 1,356. That 70-position gap reflects a 0.6-point overall rating difference: Gwin at 9.4/10 versus Trace Crossings at 8.8/10. Both schools are high performers by any statewide measure, but Gwin occupies a more elite tier.

The academic and growth data reinforce that gap with concrete numbers. Gwin Elementary School holds a 9.1/10 academic score against Trace Crossings Elementary School's 8.4/10 — a 0.7-point difference. On growth, which measures how much students improve relative to peers with similar starting points, Gwin scores 9.4/10 compared to Trace Crossings's 8.7/10. Gwin's growth advantage is particularly meaningful: it signals that students are accelerating, not just arriving at a higher baseline.

The two schools serve meaningfully different student populations. Trace Crossings Elementary School enrolls 758 students versus Gwin Elementary School's 516, making Trace Crossings nearly 47% larger. That size difference shows up in the classroom: Trace Crossings runs a 15.5:1 student-teacher ratio while Gwin sits at 12.9:1, a gap of 2.6 students per teacher. Gwin also serves a higher share of economically disadvantaged students — 47% free/reduced lunch versus 38% at Trace Crossings — making its top-14 statewide finish even more notable given that demographic context.

Both schools cover the same grade band, PK through 5, so families are choosing between genuinely comparable academic environments rather than different structural offerings. The distinction lies in Gwin's tighter classrooms and stronger measured outcomes across academic proficiency and student growth, set against Trace Crossings's larger community and somewhat lower economic need.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Trace Crossings Elementary School

Trace Crossings Elementary School suits families comfortable with a larger school environment — 758 students — who value a strong but slightly more accessible community feel. With a statewide rank of #84 and an 8.8/10 overall rating, it remains a top-tier choice for families whose priority is a well-resourced Hoover school with a broader peer network and slightly less economic diversity.

Gwin Elementary School

Gwin Elementary School is the stronger fit for families who prioritize measurable academic outcomes and smaller class sizes. At 12.9:1 student-teacher ratio, a 9.4/10 growth score, and a #14 statewide rank, it offers more individualized attention and demonstrated student acceleration — and does so while serving a higher share of economically disadvantaged students, which speaks to the consistency of its results across the student body.

More Comparisons