Charles H. Kim Elementary vs Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy
Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.7/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 49.0%.
Charles H. Kim Elementary
Los Angeles, CA
472 students
Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy
Los Angeles, CA
504 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | Charles H. Kim Elementary | Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 9.6 / 10 | 8.7 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Growth Score | 9.8 | 9.2 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 88.3% | 97.4% |
| Environment Score | 9.3 | 8.2 |
| State Rank | #9 of 9,533 | #457 of 9,533 |
| State Percentile | 100th | 95th |
Test Scores
| Subject | Charles H. Kim Elementary | Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 49.0% | 34.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 60.0% | 36.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | Charles H. Kim Elementary | Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Elementary School | Elementary School |
| Grades | Kindergarten – 5th | Kindergarten – 5th |
| Enrollment | 472 | 504 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 18.2:1 | 21.9:1 |
| Per-Pupil Spending | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 88.3% | 97.4% |
| Chronic Absenteeism | — | — |
| District | Los Angeles Unified | Los Angeles Unified |
| City | Los Angeles | Los Angeles |
Neighborhood
| Metric | Los Angeles (90004) | Los Angeles (90001) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $62,655 | $60,751 |
| Median Home Value | $1,457,200 | $513,300 |
| Median Rent | $1,752 | $1,471 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 40.0% | 7.0% |
| Poverty Rate | 18.8% | 20.5% |
| Avg Commute | 32 min | 36 min |
The data story: Charles H. Kim Elementary vs Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy
Charles H. Kim Elementary holds a 0.9-point overall rating advantage over Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy — 9.6/10 versus 8.7/10. That gap carries serious weight in context: Kim ranks #9 of 9,533 California elementary schools, placing it in the top 0.1% statewide, while Moore ranks #457, which is still an excellent result — top 5% — but a different tier entirely. Both schools sit 6.7 miles apart in Los Angeles and serve the same grade span, KG–05, so families choosing between them are comparing genuine academic performance differences, not program or grade-level fit.
On academics, Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.5/10 versus Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy's 8.2/10 — a 1.3-point delta that reflects a meaningful gap in measured proficiency. Growth scores are closer: Kim posts 9.8/10 and Moore posts 9.2/10, a 0.6-point difference that still favors Kim. What stands out is that both schools show strong upward momentum for their students, but Kim sustains that trajectory from a higher proficiency baseline, a combination that is genuinely rare at this scale.
The demographic picture separates these schools sharply. Both serve high-poverty populations — free or reduced lunch eligibility runs 88% at Charles H. Kim Elementary and 97% at Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy, meaning Moore's student body includes proportionally more economically disadvantaged children. Class sizes diverge as well: Kim's student-teacher ratio is 18.2:1 versus Moore's 21.9:1, a difference of nearly four students per teacher. Kim's lower ratio means more individual instructional contact time. Enrollment is comparable — 472 at Kim, 504 at Moore — so neither school is notably larger.
Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy's name signals a STEM-centered programmatic identity, which is a structural distinction from the general-curriculum model at Charles H. Kim Elementary. Families specifically seeking an early STEM focus will find that framing built into Moore's mission from kindergarten onward. Kim, by contrast, delivers its exceptional outcomes — the #9 statewide ranking, 9.5 academic score — within a traditional elementary structure.
Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
Charles H. Kim Elementary
Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families who prioritize raw academic outcomes and smaller class sizes above all else. Its #9 statewide rank and 18.2:1 student-teacher ratio make it the stronger choice for parents whose primary criterion is measured proficiency and individual attention, particularly if STEM specialization is not a deciding factor.
Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy
Dr. Lawrence H. Moore Math Science Technology Academy fits families who want an explicitly STEM-oriented curriculum from kindergarten and are comfortable with slightly larger classes. Its #457 statewide rank is genuinely strong, and parents whose child thrives in a math-and-science-focused school culture will find that identity embedded in Moore's structure from day one.