Skip to main content

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary vs Grattan Elementary

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary and Grattan Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.4 out of 10. In math proficiency, Chin (John Yehall) Elementary leads at 77.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Chin (John Yehall) Elementary Grattan Elementary
Overall Rating 9.4 / 10 9.2 / 10
Academic Score 10.0 8.7
Growth Score 9.7 9.5
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 75.1% 14.6%
Environment Score 8.0 9.0
State Rank #49 of 9,533 #135 of 9,533
State Percentile 100th 99th

Test Scores

Subject Chin (John Yehall) Elementary Grattan Elementary
Math Proficiency 77.0% 67.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 82.0% 62.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Chin (John Yehall) Elementary Grattan Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 253 384
Student-Teacher Ratio 23.0:1 20.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 75.1% 14.6%
Chronic Absenteeism
District San Francisco Unified San Francisco Unified
City San Francisco San Francisco

Neighborhood

Metric San Francisco (94133) San Francisco (94117)
Median Household Income $83,025 $175,096
Median Home Value $1,519,100 $1,641,400
Median Rent $1,985 $2,786
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 54.9% 78.3%
Poverty Rate 15.9% 8.4%
Avg Commute 31 min 32 min

The data story: Chin (John Yehall) Elementary vs Grattan Elementary

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary ranks #49 of 9,533 schools in California with an overall rating of 9.4/10, while Grattan Elementary ranks #135 of 9,533 with a 9.2/10 — a 0.2-point gap that places both schools firmly in California's top two percent. The difference in state rank is more telling than the raw rating delta: Chin sits 86 positions ahead of Grattan in a field of nearly ten thousand schools, a meaningful separation even if both are exceptional by any standard measure.

The academic score gap is the sharpest contrast between these two schools. Chin (John Yehall) Elementary scores a perfect 10.0/10 in academics against Grattan Elementary's 8.7/10 — a 1.3-point difference that represents a significant lead in measured proficiency. Growth scores are much closer: Chin posts 9.7/10 versus Grattan's 9.5/10, suggesting both schools are highly effective at advancing students from where they start. Chin's combination of top-tier proficiency and strong growth indicates both a high-achieving student body and an instructional environment that continues to push students forward.

The demographic profiles of these two schools diverge sharply. Chin (John Yehall) Elementary enrolls 253 students with 75% qualifying for free or reduced lunch, while Grattan Elementary serves 384 students with only 15% qualifying — a 60-percentage-point difference that reflects substantially different community contexts. Chin's student-teacher ratio of 23.0:1 is higher than Grattan's 20.2:1, meaning Grattan students get more individualized attention on average despite the larger total enrollment. For families weighing equity and resource access, Chin's high academic achievement alongside a majority low-income population signals particularly strong instructional effectiveness relative to community circumstances.

Both schools serve grades KG through 05 and sit 3.5 miles apart within San Francisco. That geographic proximity means the choice is genuinely live for families in neighborhoods between the two campuses. Neither school has a grade-level gap to negotiate — a parent moving between either school mid-elementary faces no structural disruption.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary suits families who prioritize raw academic performance above all else. Its perfect 10.0/10 academic score and #49 California rank make it the stronger choice for parents focused on proficiency outcomes, and its majority free/reduced-lunch population demonstrates that high achievement is accessible to students across income levels.

Grattan Elementary

Grattan Elementary suits families who value a lower student-teacher ratio and a more socioeconomically homogeneous peer environment. At 20.2:1 versus Chin's 23.0:1, students get measurably more face time with teachers — an advantage for kids who benefit from closer adult guidance — while still attending a top-135 school in California.

More Comparisons