Skip to main content

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary vs Muir (John) Elementary

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.4/10 compared to 8.8/10. In math proficiency, Chin (John Yehall) Elementary leads at 77.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Chin (John Yehall) Elementary Muir (John) Elementary
Overall Rating 9.4 / 10 8.8 / 10
Academic Score 10.0 9.2
Growth Score 9.7 8.4
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 75.1% 76.1%
Environment Score 8.0 9.3
State Rank #49 of 9,533 #388 of 9,533
State Percentile 100th 96th

Test Scores

Subject Chin (John Yehall) Elementary Muir (John) Elementary
Math Proficiency 77.0% 57.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 82.0% 57.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Chin (John Yehall) Elementary Muir (John) Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 253 226
Student-Teacher Ratio 23.0:1 18.8:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 75.1% 76.1%
Chronic Absenteeism
District San Francisco Unified San Francisco Unified
City San Francisco San Francisco

Neighborhood

Metric San Francisco (94133) San Francisco (94117)
Median Household Income $83,025 $175,096
Median Home Value $1,519,100 $1,641,400
Median Rent $1,985 $2,786
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 54.9% 78.3%
Poverty Rate 15.9% 8.4%
Avg Commute 31 min 32 min

The data story: Chin (John Yehall) Elementary vs Muir (John) Elementary

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary and Muir (John) Elementary are both San Francisco K–5 schools sitting 2.2 miles apart, but their overall ratings tell a clear story: Chin scores 9.6/10 against Muir's 8.4/10, a 1.2-point gap that translates into a substantial difference in state standing. Chin ranks #20 of 9,533 California elementary schools; Muir ranks #1,001 of the same pool. That is not a marginal edge — Chin sits in the top 0.2% of the state while Muir sits in the top 11%.

The academic and growth numbers sharpen that picture. Chin (John Yehall) Elementary earns a perfect 10.0/10 academic score versus Muir (John) Elementary's 9.2/10 — a meaningful 0.8-point delta on a metric that drives half the overall rating. On growth, which captures how much students gain year over year regardless of where they start, Chin scores 9.7/10 against Muir's 8.4/10 — a 1.3-point difference indicating that students at Chin are accelerating at a measurably faster pace. Both scores favor Chin by margins large enough to matter when choosing a school for a child's foundational years.

The two schools are demographically close in ways that matter for equity comparisons. Chin (John Yehall) Elementary enrolls 253 students with 75% qualifying for free or reduced lunch; Muir (John) Elementary enrolls 226 students with 76% on free or reduced lunch — effectively identical economic profiles. Where they diverge is classroom density: Chin runs a 23.0:1 student-teacher ratio while Muir runs 18.8:1. Parents who prioritize smaller class sizes and more individualized teacher attention will find Muir the better fit on that single dimension.

Both schools serve grades KG–05, so grade-span is not a differentiator for families planning a full elementary arc. The distinction comes down to documented outcomes versus daily classroom experience: Chin delivers top-20 statewide academic and growth results within a higher-density classroom environment, while Muir offers notably smaller classes at strong — but lower — performance levels.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary

Chin (John Yehall) Elementary suits families who prioritize measurable academic outcomes above all else. Its perfect 10.0 academic score and #20 California rank signal that students here are learning at an exceptionally high rate relative to peers statewide — particularly compelling for parents of children who benefit from high-achieving classroom culture and are comfortable with a 23-student classroom.

Muir (John) Elementary

Muir (John) Elementary is the better fit for families who want a strong school — top 11% statewide — with noticeably smaller classes. At 18.8:1, the student-teacher ratio is 4.2 students lower per teacher than Chin's, which translates to more direct adult attention per child. Parents of kids who thrive with closer teacher relationships or need more individualized support will find that structural difference meaningful.

More Comparisons