Skip to main content

Lafayette Elementary vs King (Thomas Starr) Elementary

Lafayette Elementary and King (Thomas Starr) Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.3 out of 10. In math proficiency, Lafayette Elementary leads at 78.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricLafayette ElementaryKing (Thomas Starr) Elementary
Overall Rating9.3 / 109.4 / 10
Academic Score9.78.9
Growth Score9.19.7
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch27.6%40%
Environment Score9.29.6
State Rank#108 of 9,539#65 of 9,539
State Percentile99th99th

Test Scores

SubjectLafayette ElementaryKing (Thomas Starr) Elementary
Math Proficiency78.0%52.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency72.0%42.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailLafayette ElementaryKing (Thomas Starr) Elementary
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesKindergarten – 5thKindergarten – 5th
Enrollment474335
Student-Teacher Ratio20.6:116.8:1
Free/Reduced Lunch27.6%40.0%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)16.2%24.2%
DistrictSan Francisco UnifiedSan Francisco Unified
CitySan FranciscoSan Francisco

Neighborhood

MetricSan Francisco (94121)San Francisco (94107)
Median Household Income$138,353$186,123
Median Home Value$1,634,600$1,227,000
Median Rent$2,327$3,378
College Educated (Bachelor's+)63.9%77.0%
Poverty Rate8.3%8.3%
Avg Commute33 min32 min

The data story: Lafayette Elementary vs King (Thomas Starr) Elementary

King (Thomas Starr) Elementary ranks #91 of 9,533 California schools, placing it 45 spots ahead of Lafayette Elementary's #136 statewide — a meaningful separation despite their overall ratings sitting just 0.1 points apart (9.3 vs. 9.2 out of 10). Both schools clear the 90th percentile statewide, so parents are choosing between two high-performers, not a strong school and a weak one.

The academic and growth scores tell opposite stories. Lafayette Elementary leads on academic proficiency with a 9.7/10 versus King (Thomas Starr) Elementary's 8.9/10 — an 0.8-point gap that reflects higher raw test performance. King (Thomas Starr) Elementary counters with a growth score of 9.5/10 against Lafayette Elementary's 9.1/10, meaning students at King are accelerating relative to their academic starting points at a faster rate. Families who prioritize where kids land on absolute benchmarks lean toward Lafayette; families who weight year-over-year learning velocity lean toward King.

King (Thomas Starr) Elementary serves 335 students at a 16.8:1 student-teacher ratio, compared to Lafayette Elementary's 474 students and 20.6:1 ratio. That 3.8-student-per-teacher difference translates to more individual attention per child at King. King also serves a higher share of economically disadvantaged students — 40% qualify for free or reduced-price lunch versus 28% at Lafayette Elementary — and its stronger growth score alongside that higher-need enrollment is a signal that King's instructional model is effective across a wider socioeconomic range.

Both schools serve kindergarten through fifth grade, keeping grade structure off the decision table. The 5.6-mile distance between them makes neighborhood proximity a practical filter for most San Francisco families — Lafayette Elementary sits in the Inner Richmond–Presidio corridor while King (Thomas Starr) Elementary serves the Castro–Noe Valley area. Families not locked into a specific attendance zone are essentially choosing between Lafayette's top-shelf academic scores and King's higher state rank, smaller classes, and stronger growth trajectory.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Lafayette Elementary

Lafayette Elementary suits families whose children are already performing at or above grade level and who prioritize absolute academic achievement. Its 9.7/10 academic score is one of the highest in California, making it the stronger fit for parents who track proficiency benchmarks closely and are less concerned about class size.

King (Thomas Starr) Elementary

King (Thomas Starr) Elementary is the better fit for families who want smaller classes, faster measurable growth, and a school that demonstrates strong outcomes across a socioeconomically diverse student body. Its #91 state rank and 16.8:1 student-teacher ratio make it the choice for parents who value learning momentum and individual attention over raw test-score rankings.

More Comparisons