Skip to main content

Micheltorena Street Elementary vs Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary

Micheltorena Street Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.3/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary leads at 45.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Micheltorena Street Elementary Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary
Overall Rating 9.3 / 10 8.6 / 10
Academic Score 8.4 9.0
Growth Score 9.8 8.4
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 42.1% 94.4%
Environment Score 9.2 8.6
State Rank #96 of 9,539 #714 of 9,539
State Percentile 99th 93th

Test Scores

Subject Micheltorena Street Elementary Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary
Math Proficiency 41.0% 45.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 36.0% 43.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Micheltorena Street Elementary Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 366 340
Student-Teacher Ratio 20.3:1 20.0:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 42.1% 94.4%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23) 17.8% 31.5%
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90026) Los Angeles (90022)
Median Household Income $85,835 $67,829
Median Home Value $1,143,400 $603,500
Median Rent $1,822 $1,407
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 47.4% 9.6%
Poverty Rate 16.6% 16.3%
Avg Commute 32 min 30 min

The data story: Micheltorena Street Elementary vs Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary

Micheltorena Street Elementary ranks #116 out of 9,533 schools in California, while Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary ranks #42 out of those same 9,533 schools — a 74-position gap that places Hamasaki in the top half-percent of the state. The overall rating difference is narrow at 0.2 points (9.2 vs. 9.4), but the state rank separation tells a sharper story about where each school sits in the California distribution.

On academics, Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary scores 9.0/10 against Micheltorena Street Elementary's 8.4/10 — a 0.6-point gap that reflects meaningfully stronger tested proficiency at Hamasaki. Growth scores are nearly identical: Micheltorena Street Elementary at 9.8/10 and Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary at 9.9/10. Both schools are exceptional at accelerating student progress regardless of where kids start, which makes academic score the primary differentiator between them.

The most significant contrast is socioeconomic: free and reduced-price lunch eligibility runs at 42% at Micheltorena Street Elementary versus 94% at Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary. Hamasaki's near-perfect growth score in the context of a 94% FRL population signals unusually strong instructional execution with a high-need student body. Enrollment is similar — 366 at Micheltorena, 340 at Hamasaki — and student-teacher ratios are nearly identical at 20.3:1 and 20.0:1 respectively, so class-size experience will feel comparable at both schools.

Both schools serve grades KG through 05 and sit 7.5 miles apart within Los Angeles. Neither school has a grade-span or program-structure advantage over the other at the elementary level. The differentiation comes down to academic proficiency scores and state rank: Hamasaki's #42 California ranking and 9.0 academic score put it ahead of Micheltorena's #116 and 8.4 on tested outcomes, while Micheltorena serves a less economically concentrated population and still ranks in the top 2% statewide.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Micheltorena Street Elementary

Micheltorena Street Elementary fits families who prioritize a more economically mixed school environment — 42% FRL versus Hamasaki's 94% — while still accessing a top-2% California school with a 9.8 growth score. It suits parents in the Silver Lake or Los Feliz corridors for whom proximity matters and a slightly lower academic score is an acceptable trade-off for a more blended demographic setting.

Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary

Morris K. Hamasaki Elementary suits families who weight raw academic outcomes and state ranking above all else. Its 9.0 academic score and #42 California rank are the stronger numbers, and its near-perfect growth score alongside a 94% FRL population demonstrates that the school consistently outperforms expectations — a meaningful signal for parents seeking high instructional quality regardless of neighborhood income level.

More Comparisons