Skip to main content

Sage Canyon vs Sequoia Elementary

Sage Canyon and Sequoia Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.0 out of 10. Sage Canyon is significantly larger with 478 students, about 2.8× the size of Sequoia Elementary (170). In math proficiency, Sage Canyon leads at 86.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Sage Canyon Sequoia Elementary
Overall Rating 9.0 / 10 9.4 / 10
Academic Score 9.7 8.8
Growth Score 8.8 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 4.6% 65.9%
Environment Score 8.3 9.2
State Rank #205 of 9,533 #48 of 9,533
State Percentile 98th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Sage Canyon Sequoia Elementary
Math Proficiency 86.0% 37.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 86.0% 47.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Sage Canyon Sequoia Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 6th Kindergarten – 6th
Enrollment 478 170
Student-Teacher Ratio 19.9:1 17.0:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 4.6% 65.9%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Del Mar Union Elementary San Diego Unified
City San Diego San Diego

Neighborhood

Metric San Diego (92130) San Diego (92117)
Median Household Income $201,731 $105,286
Median Home Value $1,602,800 $914,400
Median Rent $3,289 $2,115
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 81.4% 50.7%
Poverty Rate 4.7% 10.4%
Avg Commute 23 min 21 min

The data story: Sage Canyon vs Sequoia Elementary

Sequoia Elementary ranks #48 of 9,533 California schools, placing it in the top 1% statewide. Sage Canyon sits at #205 of 9,533 — still a top-3% finish, but 157 spots behind. The overall rating gap between the two is 0.4 points, with Sequoia Elementary scoring 9.4/10 against Sage Canyon's 9.0/10. For parents using state rank as a primary filter, Sequoia Elementary's position is notably stronger, though both schools are high performers by any objective measure.

The academic and growth scores tell a split story. Sage Canyon posts a 9.7/10 academic score versus Sequoia Elementary's 8.8/10 — a difference of 0.9 points, suggesting Sage Canyon's students score higher on raw proficiency benchmarks. Sequoia Elementary flips the advantage on growth, earning a 9.8/10 compared to Sage Canyon's 8.8/10. That 1.0-point growth edge means Sequoia Elementary is advancing students at a faster rate relative to their starting point, a measure that often reflects instructional quality more directly than absolute proficiency.

The two schools serve meaningfully different populations. Sage Canyon enrolls 478 students at a 19.9:1 student-teacher ratio, while Sequoia Elementary serves 170 students at 17.0:1 — nearly three fewer students per teacher. The equity gap is equally sharp: 5% of Sage Canyon students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch compared to 66% at Sequoia Elementary. Sequoia Elementary's growth score achievement against a high-FRL population makes it stand out; high growth with a high-need population is a stronger institutional signal than high growth in a low-need one.

Both schools serve grades KG through 6 and are separated by 6.9 miles within San Diego. The primary structural difference beyond demographics is class size — the 2.9-student-per-teacher gap at Sequoia Elementary translates to more individual attention in a smaller school community overall, given its enrollment is less than half of Sage Canyon's 478 students.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Sage Canyon

Sage Canyon suits families prioritizing top-of-class academic proficiency benchmarks and who are comfortable in a larger school environment. Its 9.7/10 academic score is among the highest in California, making it the stronger choice for parents whose primary focus is absolute achievement levels rather than growth trajectory.

Sequoia Elementary

Sequoia Elementary suits families who weight a school's ability to accelerate student progress — its 9.8/10 growth score and smaller 17.0:1 ratio mean more individualized attention. Parents who value a school that demonstrably moves all students forward, and who want a top-48 California ranking, will find Sequoia Elementary the stronger fit.

More Comparisons