Skip to main content

Vermont Avenue Elementary vs Charles White Elementary

Vermont Avenue Elementary and Charles White Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 8.8 out of 10. In math proficiency, Vermont Avenue Elementary leads at 27.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Vermont Avenue Elementary Charles White Elementary
Overall Rating 8.8 / 10 9.1 / 10
Academic Score 7.8 7.4
Growth Score 9.5 9.9
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 90.4% 98%
Environment Score 8.6 9.4
State Rank #367 of 9,533 #182 of 9,533
State Percentile 96th 98th

Test Scores

Subject Vermont Avenue Elementary Charles White Elementary
Math Proficiency 27.0% 17.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 35.0% 22.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Vermont Avenue Elementary Charles White Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th 1st – 5th
Enrollment 356 248
Student-Teacher Ratio 20.9:1 17.7:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 90.4% 98.0%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90007) Los Angeles (90057)
Median Household Income $36,032 $44,876
Median Home Value $852,900 $694,500
Median Rent $1,480 $1,395
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 28.6% 23.2%
Poverty Rate 38.7% 27.2%
Avg Commute 30 min 35 min

The data story: Vermont Avenue Elementary vs Charles White Elementary

Vermont Avenue Elementary and Charles White Elementary sit 2.2 miles apart in Los Angeles, but their overall ratings diverge meaningfully: Charles White Elementary scores 9.0/10 against Vermont Avenue Elementary's 8.6/10 — a 0.4-point gap that translates to a significant state rank difference. Vermont Avenue Elementary ranks #698 of 9,533 California elementary schools, while Charles White Elementary ranks #293 of 9,533, placing it in roughly the top 3% statewide compared to Vermont Avenue's top 7%.

Academically, the two schools split in opposite directions depending on the metric. Vermont Avenue Elementary edges ahead on raw academic proficiency at 7.8/10 versus Charles White Elementary's 7.4/10. Growth, however, tells the opposite story: Charles White Elementary scores 9.9/10 on student growth compared to Vermont Avenue Elementary's 9.5/10. That 0.4-point growth advantage at Charles White means students there are advancing at a faster pace relative to their peers — a meaningful signal for families weighing current attainment against trajectory.

Vermont Avenue Elementary enrolls 356 students to Charles White Elementary's 248, and that size difference shows up in classroom density. Vermont Avenue Elementary's student-teacher ratio is 20.9:1 versus Charles White Elementary's 17.7:1 — roughly three fewer students per classroom at Charles White. Both schools serve high-poverty populations: Vermont Avenue Elementary reports 90% of students on free or reduced-price lunch, while Charles White Elementary reports 98%, the highest end of the range and an indicator of the concentrated economic need Charles White's strong growth numbers are overcoming.

One practical distinction for families with kindergarten-age children: Vermont Avenue Elementary serves grades KG through 5, while Charles White Elementary begins at grade 1. Families with incoming kindergartners must account for that gap — Charles White Elementary does not offer a kindergarten program, requiring a separate enrollment decision for the first year before a potential transition.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Vermont Avenue Elementary

Vermont Avenue Elementary suits families with a kindergarten-age child who need a single school from KG through 5th grade without a mid-elementary transition. Its 7.8/10 academic score is slightly stronger than Charles White's on current proficiency, and its larger enrollment of 356 students offers more peer diversity, though at the cost of larger class sizes at 20.9:1.

Charles White Elementary

Charles White Elementary suits families with a child entering 1st grade or above who prioritize long-term academic trajectory over current proficiency levels. Its #293 state rank, 9.9/10 growth score, and 17.7:1 student-teacher ratio make it the stronger choice for parents who want a smaller, higher-momentum classroom environment — and who are prepared to arrange kindergarten separately.

More Comparisons