Hearst ES vs Two Rivers PCS - Young ES
Hearst ES has a higher overall rating of 9.3/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, Hearst ES leads at 62.0%.
Hearst ES
Washington, DC
337 students
Two Rivers PCS - Young ES
Washington, DC
378 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | Hearst ES | Two Rivers PCS - Young ES |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 9.3 / 10 | 8.6 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Growth Score | 9.7 | 9.9 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Environment Score | 7.5 | 4.7 |
| State Rank | #3 of 240 | #14 of 240 |
| State Percentile | 99th | 95th |
Test Scores
| Subject | Hearst ES | Two Rivers PCS - Young ES |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 62.0% | 27.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 62.0% | 27.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | Hearst ES | Two Rivers PCS - Young ES |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Elementary School | Elementary School |
| Grades | Pre-K – 5th | Pre-K – 5th |
| Enrollment | 337 | 378 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 11.6:1 | 13.0:1 |
| Per-Pupil Spending | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | — | — |
| Chronic Absenteeism | — | — |
| District | District of Columbia Public Schools | Two Rivers PCS |
| City | Washington | Washington |
Neighborhood
| Metric | Washington (20008) | Washington (20002) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $123,653 | $114,482 |
| Median Home Value | $894,100 | $813,700 |
| Median Rent | $2,202 | $2,140 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 88.9% | 69.8% |
| Poverty Rate | 7.8% | 13.6% |
| Avg Commute | 29 min | 30 min |
The data story: Hearst ES vs Two Rivers PCS - Young ES
Hearst ES and Two Rivers PCS - Young ES are both top-tier elementary schools in Washington, District of Columbia, but Hearst ES holds a clear edge in overall standing. Hearst ES scores 9.6/10 against Two Rivers PCS - Young ES's 9.0/10 — a 0.6-point gap — and ranks #2 of 240 DC schools, placing it among the city's very best. Two Rivers PCS - Young ES ranks #11 of 240, which is still an exceptional standing, but trails Hearst by nine positions in a competitive field of 240 schools.
Academically, Hearst ES pulls ahead with a 9.7/10 academic score compared to Two Rivers PCS - Young ES's 8.9/10 — a meaningful 0.8-point delta that reflects stronger tested proficiency outcomes. The growth picture flips, however: Two Rivers PCS - Young ES earns a 9.9/10 growth score versus Hearst ES's 9.7/10, meaning students at Two Rivers are gaining ground at a marginally faster rate relative to academic peers. Families weighing raw achievement against student trajectory will find real differentiation in these two numbers.
On the demographic and structural side, Two Rivers PCS - Young ES enrolls slightly more students at 378 versus Hearst ES's 337, a modest difference. The more notable gap is in staffing: Hearst ES operates at an 11.6:1 student-teacher ratio compared to Two Rivers PCS - Young ES's 13.0:1, giving Hearst meaningfully smaller class sizes and more individualized adult attention per child. Both schools serve grades PK through 05, so neither offers a grade-span advantage for elementary-age families.
One structural distinction shapes the enrollment process significantly: Hearst ES is a regular District of Columbia public school with neighborhood-based assignment, while Two Rivers PCS - Young ES is a public charter school that requires a separate application and typically uses a lottery for admission. The two campuses sit 6.1 miles apart, so geography may also factor into a family's calculus alongside each school's distinct enrollment pathway.
Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
Hearst ES
Hearst ES suits families who prioritize top-of-district academic achievement and smaller class sizes — its 11.6:1 student-teacher ratio and #2 DC ranking make it the stronger fit for parents who want the highest tested-proficiency environment and the simplicity of neighborhood public school enrollment without a lottery process.
Two Rivers PCS - Young ES
Two Rivers PCS - Young ES is the better fit for families who value student growth momentum over raw proficiency scores — its 9.9/10 growth score edges Hearst — and who are willing to navigate a charter lottery in exchange for a slightly larger, mission-driven school community that emphasizes expeditionary learning.