Fairview Elem vs Meadow Lane Elem
Fairview Elem and Meadow Lane Elem are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.0 out of 10. In math proficiency, Meadow Lane Elem leads at 56.0%.
Fairview Elem
Olathe, KS
253 students
Meadow Lane Elem
Olathe, KS
363 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | Fairview Elem | Meadow Lane Elem |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 9.0 / 10 | 8.9 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Growth Score | 9.8 | 9.8 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 68% | 7.2% |
| Environment Score | 8.4 | 4.9 |
| State Rank | #46 of 1,293 | #56 of 1,293 |
| State Percentile | 97th | 96th |
Test Scores
| Subject | Fairview Elem | Meadow Lane Elem |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 17.0% | 56.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 32.0% | 68.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
Neighborhood
| Metric | Olathe (66061) | Olathe (66061) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $109,110 | $109,110 |
| Median Home Value | $337,400 | $337,400 |
| Median Rent | $1,228 | $1,228 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 44.8% | 44.8% |
| Poverty Rate | 6.3% | 6.3% |
| Avg Commute | 21 min | 21 min |
The data story: Fairview Elem vs Meadow Lane Elem
Fairview Elementary and Meadow Lane Elementary sit 2.6 miles apart in Olathe, Kansas, but they land in very different positions in the state rankings. Meadow Lane Elem ranks #63 of 1,293 Kansas elementary schools, while Fairview Elem ranks #128 of 1,293 — a 65-spot gap that translates to a meaningful difference in overall ratings: 8.9/10 for Meadow Lane versus 8.4/10 for Fairview. Both schools clear the top 10% of Kansas elementaries, so this is a comparison between two strong options, not a clear winner versus a weak alternative.
The sharpest delta between the two schools is academic proficiency. Meadow Lane Elem scores 9.9/10 on academics against Fairview Elem's 8.2/10 — a 1.7-point gap on a 10-point scale. That difference reflects the share of students meeting or exceeding grade-level standards in math and reading, and it is the primary driver of Meadow Lane's higher overall rating. Growth, by contrast, is a dead heat: both Fairview Elem and Meadow Lane Elem score 9.8/10, meaning students at both schools make comparable year-over-year academic progress regardless of where they start. A family prioritizing upward trajectory over absolute proficiency levels will find both schools equally strong on that dimension.
The demographic and resource profiles of the two schools diverge substantially. Fairview Elem serves 253 students with a 10.5:1 student-teacher ratio and 68% of students qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch. Meadow Lane Elem enrolls 363 students at a 15.8:1 ratio with 7% FRL eligibility. Fairview's lower ratio means more adult attention per child on average, which often matters most for students who need individualized support. Meadow Lane's much lower FRL rate reflects a more affluent student body, which correlates with higher baseline test scores and drives much of the academic score gap between the two schools.
Both Fairview Elem and Meadow Lane Elem serve grades PK through 5, so families won't find a difference in grade span or transition timing. The structural difference is Fairview's smaller, more economically diverse community paired with tighter staffing ratios, versus Meadow Lane's larger enrollment in a lower-poverty setting with a top-10 state rank.
Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
Fairview Elem
Fairview Elem fits families who want a smaller school with more individualized adult attention — its 10.5:1 student-teacher ratio is 50% lower than Meadow Lane's — and those who value an economically diverse classroom environment. It is also the stronger choice for a student who benefits from close teacher relationships or additional academic support, given both schools post identical growth scores despite Fairview serving a much higher-need population.
Meadow Lane Elem
Meadow Lane Elem fits families who prioritize raw academic proficiency benchmarks, reflected in its 9.9/10 academic score and #63 state rank. The larger student body offers a wider peer network, and the school's low FRL rate (7%) signals an affluent, low-mobility student population that tends to produce stable classroom environments. It is the clearer choice for families where peer academic context and top-decile Kansas rankings are the deciding factors.