Skip to main content

Meadow Lane Elem vs Green Springs Elem

Meadow Lane Elem and Green Springs Elem are very closely rated, both scoring around 8.9 out of 10. In math proficiency, Meadow Lane Elem leads at 56.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Meadow Lane Elem Green Springs Elem
Overall Rating 8.9 / 10 9.0 / 10
Academic Score 9.9 9.1
Growth Score 9.8 9.2
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 7.2% 17.1%
Environment Score 4.9 8.4
State Rank #56 of 1,293 #47 of 1,293
State Percentile 96th 96th

Test Scores

Subject Meadow Lane Elem Green Springs Elem
Math Proficiency 56.0% 47.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 68.0% 52.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Meadow Lane Elem Green Springs Elem
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 5th Pre-K – 5th
Enrollment 363 246
Student-Teacher Ratio 15.8:1 10.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 7.2% 17.1%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Olathe Olathe
City Olathe Olathe

Neighborhood

Metric Olathe (66061) Olathe (66062)
Median Household Income $109,110 $116,248
Median Home Value $337,400 $342,700
Median Rent $1,228 $1,349
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 44.8% 53.3%
Poverty Rate 6.3% 5.2%
Avg Commute 21 min 21 min

The data story: Meadow Lane Elem vs Green Springs Elem

Green Springs Elementary ranks #39 of 1,293 Kansas schools, placing it 24 spots ahead of Meadow Lane Elementary at #63. That gap translates to a 0.3-point overall rating difference — Green Springs at 9.2/10, Meadow Lane at 8.9/10 — though both schools sit well within the top 5% of the state. For families weighing a 6.3-mile difference in commute, both destinations represent genuinely strong outcomes.

The academic and growth picture flips the overall ranking. Meadow Lane Elementary scores 9.9/10 on academics versus Green Springs Elementary's 9.1/10 — a 0.8-point gap that reflects Meadow Lane's notably higher proficiency rates. On growth, Meadow Lane again leads, 9.8/10 to Green Springs's 9.2/10. That 0.6-point growth advantage means Meadow Lane students are advancing faster year-over-year relative to expectations, even after controlling for their already-high baseline scores.

Green Springs Elementary's student-teacher ratio of 10.2:1 is considerably tighter than Meadow Lane Elementary's 15.8:1 — a difference of 5.6 students per teacher that translates directly to more individual attention per child. Green Springs also serves a more economically diverse student body, with 17% of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch compared to 7% at Meadow Lane. Enrollment at Meadow Lane runs 363 students versus 246 at Green Springs, making Green Springs the smaller, more intimate campus by 117 students.

Both schools serve grades PK through 5, so neither offers a grade-range advantage. The key structural distinction is class size and school scale: Green Springs's lower ratio and smaller enrollment create a noticeably different daily environment than Meadow Lane, even though Meadow Lane's raw academic and growth scores are higher.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Meadow Lane Elem

Meadow Lane Elementary suits families who prioritize peak academic performance and faster measured growth. Its 9.9/10 academic score and 9.8/10 growth score are among the strongest in Kansas, making it the better fit for parents whose primary criterion is maximizing tested proficiency and year-over-year progress, and who are comfortable with a standard-sized classroom at a 15.8:1 ratio.

Green Springs Elem

Green Springs Elementary suits families who want a smaller, more personalized setting. Its 10.2:1 student-teacher ratio and 246-student enrollment mean more adult attention and a tighter-knit community. It also serves a broader socioeconomic mix, which may appeal to parents who value that environment. Its #39 state rank means families trade some raw academic score for those structural advantages.

More Comparisons