Skip to main content

John D Hardy vs Katharine Lee Bates

John D Hardy and Katharine Lee Bates are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.5 out of 10. In math proficiency, John D Hardy leads at 82.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric John D Hardy Katharine Lee Bates
Overall Rating 9.5 / 10 9.2 / 10
Academic Score 9.7 9.0
Growth Score 9.4 9.6
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 0% 0%
Environment Score 9.3 8.4
State Rank #9 of 1,791 #31 of 1,791
State Percentile 100th 98th

Test Scores

Subject John D Hardy Katharine Lee Bates
Math Proficiency 82.0% 72.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 82.0% 82.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail John D Hardy Katharine Lee Bates
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 225 253
Student-Teacher Ratio 11.8:1 13.3:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch
Chronic Absenteeism
District Wellesley Wellesley
City Wellesley Wellesley

Neighborhood

Metric Wellesley (02482) Wellesley (02481)
Median Household Income $240,069 $250,001
Median Home Value $1,255,200 $1,642,700
Median Rent $2,674 $3,064
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 83.5% 90.1%
Poverty Rate 4.0% 2.7%
Avg Commute 31 min 28 min

The data story: John D Hardy vs Katharine Lee Bates

John D Hardy and Katharine Lee Bates are both exceptional elementary schools sitting 0.6 miles apart in Wellesley, Massachusetts, yet they are not identical. John D Hardy holds an overall rating of 9.5/10 versus Katharine Lee Bates at 9.2/10 — a 0.3-point gap that reflects a meaningful difference in how each school performs against state benchmarks. In absolute terms, John D Hardy ranks #9 of 1,791 schools in Massachusetts while Katharine Lee Bates ranks #31 — both elite, but Hardy sits 22 spots higher in a state with no shortage of strong elementary programs.

The academic score delta is the sharpest distinction between the two schools. John D Hardy scores 9.7/10 in academics against Katharine Lee Bates's 9.0/10 — a 0.7-point gap that signals consistently higher proficiency outcomes at Hardy. The growth picture flips: Katharine Lee Bates earns a 9.6/10 growth score compared to John D Hardy's 9.4/10, meaning Bates is pushing students forward at a marginally faster pace year over year. Families prioritizing current achievement levels will find Hardy's academic edge compelling; those who weight trajectory and instructional momentum may view Bates's growth advantage as the more predictive signal.

Katharine Lee Bates enrolls 253 students compared to John D Hardy's 225, a modest 28-student difference in a district where both schools are small by any measure. The more consequential gap is in student-teacher ratio: John D Hardy runs at 11.8 students per teacher versus 13.3 at Katharine Lee Bates. That 1.5-student difference per classroom compounds across a school day — Hardy families get meaningfully more individualized adult attention per child without leaving the same Wellesley zip code.

Both schools serve grades KG through 05, so neither offers a structural advantage in grade span. The comparison ultimately comes down to whether a family values Hardy's sharper academic scores and lower class sizes, or Bates's slightly stronger growth score and marginally larger peer community — two different expressions of excellence within a single high-performing district.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

John D Hardy

John D Hardy suits families where demonstrated academic proficiency is the primary criterion — its 9.7/10 academic score and 11.8:1 student-teacher ratio make it the stronger fit for children who benefit from more direct teacher attention and for parents who want the top-ranked option within Wellesley's already exceptional elementary tier.

Katharine Lee Bates

Katharine Lee Bates suits families who prioritize learning velocity over static proficiency rankings. Its 9.6/10 growth score edges Hardy, signaling strong instructional momentum — a meaningful differentiator for students entering below grade level or for parents who believe growth trajectory better predicts long-term academic outcomes than a single-year proficiency snapshot.

More Comparisons