Skip to main content

Thornapple Elementary School vs Kent Education CenterOakleigh

Kent Education CenterOakleigh has a higher overall rating of 9.3/10 compared to 8.1/10. Thornapple Elementary School is significantly larger with 387 students, about 9.9× the size of Kent Education CenterOakleigh (39). In math proficiency, Thornapple Elementary School leads at 97.5%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricThornapple Elementary SchoolKent Education CenterOakleigh
Overall Rating8.1 / 109.3 / 10
Academic Score9.68.7
Growth Score7.310.0
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch16.8%59%
Environment Score7.88.4
State Rank#300 of 3,192#24 of 3,192
State Percentile91th99th

Test Scores

SubjectThornapple Elementary SchoolKent Education CenterOakleigh
Math Proficiency97.5%15.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency97.5%24.5%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailThornapple Elementary SchoolKent Education CenterOakleigh
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesPre-K – 4thKindergarten – 8th
Enrollment38739
Student-Teacher Ratio17.6:13.9:1
Free/Reduced Lunch16.8%59.0%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)13.4%82.1%
DistrictForest Hills Public SchoolsKent ISD
CityGrand RapidsGrand Rapids

Neighborhood

MetricGrand Rapids (49546)Grand Rapids (49504)
Median Household Income$97,386$68,326
Median Home Value$389,100$222,600
Median Rent$1,275$1,145
College Educated (Bachelor's+)60.8%38.5%
Poverty Rate7.5%15.6%
Avg Commute18 min20 min

The data story: Thornapple Elementary School vs Kent Education CenterOakleigh

Kent Education CenterOakleigh holds a 0.9-point overall rating advantage over Thornapple Elementary School — 9.6 versus 8.7 — and its state rank makes that gap feel larger in context. Thornapple sits at #138 of 3,190 Michigan schools, a strong result, but Kent Education CenterOakleigh ranks #8 statewide, placing it among the top fraction of a percent of all Michigan schools. Both serve Grand Rapids families and sit 11.8 miles apart, yet they function as fundamentally different institutions.

The component scores tell a nuanced story. Thornapple Elementary earns a 9.6 academic score — a full point above Kent Education CenterOakleigh's 8.7 — signaling higher raw proficiency on standardized assessments. Kent reverses the advantage on growth: a 10.0 growth score versus Thornapple's 9.3 means students at Kent are making exceptional year-over-year gains relative to academic peers, a signal of instructional effectiveness that operates independent of where students start when they walk in the door.

The demographic and resource profile separates these schools sharply. Thornapple Elementary enrolls 387 students; Kent Education CenterOakleigh serves just 39 — barely a tenth of the population. That difference is reflected in the student-teacher ratio: 3.9:1 at Kent against 17.6:1 at Thornapple. The free-and-reduced-lunch rate adds more context — 17% of Thornapple students qualify compared to 59% at Kent, meaning Kent draws from a substantially more economically disadvantaged population while still outranking nearly every school in Michigan.

The two schools also differ in structural scope. Thornapple Elementary runs pre-K through grade 4, a conventional early-elementary span. Kent Education CenterOakleigh covers kindergarten through grade 8, giving families a single-school path through middle school and eliminating the transition that typically falls at grades 5 or 6. For parents counting on continuity, that K–8 model is a concrete practical difference, not just a programmatic label.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Thornapple Elementary School

Thornapple Elementary suits families seeking strong academic proficiency scores — 9.6 academic rating — in a conventional PK–4 neighborhood school with a larger peer community. Its 17% free-and-reduced-lunch rate and 387-student enrollment make it a natural fit for families in lower-poverty catchment areas who want a high-achieving traditional elementary without the specialized, small-cohort structure of a program school.

Kent Education CenterOakleigh

Kent Education CenterOakleigh suits families who need intensive individual attention — the 3.9:1 student-teacher ratio is the clearest differentiator — or whose children are starting from behind and need a school with a proven 10.0 growth record. Its K–8 span also appeals to parents who want to avoid a mid-stream school transition, and its high FRL population signals experience serving kids who need more than a standard classroom cadence.

More Comparisons