MIDLAND SCHOOL vs OSBORN SCHOOL
MIDLAND SCHOOL and OSBORN SCHOOL are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.1 out of 10. In math proficiency, MIDLAND SCHOOL leads at 78.0%.
MIDLAND SCHOOL
Rye, NY
452 students
OSBORN SCHOOL
Rye, NY
461 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | MIDLAND SCHOOL | OSBORN SCHOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 9.1 / 10 | 9.2 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Growth Score | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 0% | 0% |
| Environment Score | 9.6 | 9.6 |
| State Rank | #59 of 4,739 | #34 of 4,739 |
| State Percentile | 99th | 99th |
Test Scores
| Subject | MIDLAND SCHOOL | OSBORN SCHOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 78.0% | 73.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 79.0% | 77.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | MIDLAND SCHOOL | OSBORN SCHOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Elementary School | Elementary School |
| Grades | Kindergarten – 5th | Kindergarten – 5th |
| Enrollment | 452 | 461 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Per-Pupil Spending | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | — | — |
| Chronic Absenteeism | — | — |
| District | RYE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | RYE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT |
| City | Rye | Rye |
Neighborhood
| Metric | Rye (10580) | Rye (10580) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $242,015 | $242,015 |
| Median Home Value | $1,834,100 | $1,834,100 |
| Median Rent | $2,764 | $2,764 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 80.9% | 80.9% |
| Poverty Rate | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Avg Commute | 39 min | 39 min |
The data story: MIDLAND SCHOOL vs OSBORN SCHOOL
Osborn School holds the edge in overall rating, scoring 9.2 out of 10 against Midland School's 9.1, but the more meaningful difference surfaces in state rankings: Osborn School sits at #34 of 4,739 schools in New York, while Midland School ranks #59 of 4,739 — a 25-position gap that places both schools firmly in the top 1.5 percent statewide. Parents choosing between two schools 1.1 miles apart in Rye are working with genuinely elite options; the question is which margin matters most to their family.
On academics, Midland School leads with a 9.0 academic score versus Osborn School's 8.8 — a concrete, if narrow, advantage in tested proficiency. The growth picture flips: Osborn School scores 9.3 on growth versus Midland School's 9.0, meaning students at Osborn are gaining ground at a measurably faster pace relative to their starting points. Families who prioritize how quickly a school accelerates progress will find Osborn's 0.3-point growth lead meaningful; those focused on absolute achievement levels will favor Midland's academic score advantage.
Enrollment at both schools is nearly identical — Midland School at 452 students, Osborn School at 461 — so class-size anxiety does not separate them. The student-teacher ratio does: Midland School runs 10.5 students per teacher, while Osborn School runs 9.2 students per teacher. That 1.3-student difference translates to roughly one additional adult touchpoint per classroom, which compounds over a K–5 trajectory for children who benefit from more individualized attention.
Both Midland School and Osborn School serve grades K through 5 with no structural difference in grade span, so neither offers an advantage in grade coverage for elementary-age children. The competitive separation comes down to three narrowly diverging metrics — Midland's slightly stronger academic score, Osborn's stronger growth score and tighter student-teacher ratio, and a 25-rank state advantage for Osborn — rather than any categorical program or level distinction.
Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
MIDLAND SCHOOL
Midland School suits families who weight current academic proficiency above growth trajectory — particularly those with children performing at or near grade level who want a school where tested achievement scores are marginally higher. Its 9.0 academic score is the concrete differentiator for parents whose primary benchmark is where students are, not how fast they're moving.
OSBORN SCHOOL
Osborn School fits families prioritizing learning velocity and smaller instructional groups. Its 9.3 growth score and 9.2:1 student-teacher ratio make it the stronger pick for children who benefit from more individualized attention or who are working to accelerate from a lower starting point — and its #34 state rank affirms the outcome that approach produces.