Skip to main content

PS 165 IDA POSNER vs PS 48 MAPLETON

PS 48 MAPLETON has a higher overall rating of 7.1/10 compared to 6.5/10. PS 48 MAPLETON is significantly larger with 496 students, about 2.5× the size of PS 165 IDA POSNER (199). In math proficiency, PS 48 MAPLETON leads at 93.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricPS 165 IDA POSNERPS 48 MAPLETON
Overall Rating6.5 / 107.1 / 10
Academic Score4.77.7
Growth Score9.47.0
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch98%87.1%
Environment Score2.16.2
State Rank#2,129 of 4,742#1,572 of 4,742
State Percentile55th67th

Test Scores

SubjectPS 165 IDA POSNERPS 48 MAPLETON
Math Proficiency65.0%93.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency45.0%76.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailPS 165 IDA POSNERPS 48 MAPLETON
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesPre-K – 5thPre-K – 5th
Enrollment199496
Student-Teacher Ratio11.1:110.8:1
Free/Reduced Lunch98.0%87.1%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)77.4%35.1%
DistrictNEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #23NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #20
CityBrooklynBrooklyn

Neighborhood

MetricBrooklyn (11212)Brooklyn (11204)
Median Household Income$40,060$67,588
Median Home Value$549,400$1,097,200
Median Rent$1,231$1,751
College Educated (Bachelor's+)16.4%30.5%
Poverty Rate33.7%20.2%
Avg Commute50 min41 min

The data story: PS 165 IDA POSNER vs PS 48 MAPLETON

PS 48 Mapleton holds a meaningful overall edge over PS 165 Ida Posner: an 8.6 vs. 7.7 out of 10, a 0.9-point gap that translates directly into state rank position. PS 48 Mapleton ranks #221 of 4,742 schools in New York, placing it in the top 5 percent statewide. PS 165 Ida Posner ranks #984 of 4,742 — a respectable top quarter, but a significant step below Mapleton's position. For Brooklyn parents prioritizing a school with demonstrated standing against peers across New York, that 763-rank difference is concrete and consequential.

On academics, PS 48 Mapleton scores 8.3 out of 10 versus PS 165 Ida Posner's 7.5 — a 0.8-point gap in measured proficiency. The growth picture flips: PS 165 Ida Posner posts a 9.9 growth score against PS 48 Mapleton's 9.5, meaning students at Ida Posner are gaining ground relative to academic expectations at a slightly faster rate. Parents weighing current achievement level against year-over-year learning velocity will find a genuine trade-off between these two schools, not a clean winner.

PS 165 Ida Posner serves 199 students compared to PS 48 Mapleton's 496 — Mapleton enrolls more than twice as many children. Despite that size difference, both schools maintain nearly identical student-teacher ratios: 11.1:1 at Ida Posner and 10.8:1 at Mapleton, so neither school has a structural classroom-size advantage. The free and reduced-price lunch rate — 98% at PS 165 Ida Posner versus 87% at PS 48 Mapleton — reflects a higher concentration of economic need at Ida Posner, which gives the school's 9.9 growth score additional weight; those gains are happening in a higher-challenge demographic context.

Both schools are public elementary programs serving grades PK through 5, so families with children in that range have no grade-span incompatibility to consider. The two campuses sit 4.7 miles apart within Brooklyn, making them a realistic either/or decision for families in the borough rather than schools in overlapping zones.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

PS 165 IDA POSNER

PS 165 Ida Posner suits families who prioritize a small, tight-knit school environment — 199 students means children are known by name, not lost in the crowd — and who value exceptional learning velocity. Its 9.9 growth score is near-perfect, making it a strong fit for students who benefit from focused, high-growth instruction regardless of current proficiency level.

PS 48 MAPLETON

PS 48 Mapleton suits families whose primary filter is demonstrated academic standing. Its 8.6 overall rating and #221 state rank signal consistent proficiency outcomes at scale. At 496 students, it also offers the social breadth and extracurricular depth that comes with a larger school, appealing to families who want more peer diversity and program variety alongside strong academics.

More Comparisons