Skip to main content

Creston Elementary School vs Stephenson Elementary School

Creston Elementary School has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, Stephenson Elementary School leads at 72.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Creston Elementary School Stephenson Elementary School
Overall Rating 9.6 / 10 8.6 / 10
Academic Score 9.8 9.9
Growth Score 9.7 8.9
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 77.7% 11.6%
Environment Score 9.1 5.9
State Rank #4 of 1,226 #104 of 1,226
State Percentile 100th 92th

Test Scores

Subject Creston Elementary School Stephenson Elementary School
Math Proficiency 51.0% 72.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 62.0% 82.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Creston Elementary School Stephenson Elementary School
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 238 310
Student-Teacher Ratio 15.9:1 20.7:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 77.7% 11.6%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Portland SD 1J Portland SD 1J
City Portland Portland

Neighborhood

Metric Portland (97206) Portland (97219)
Median Household Income $94,233 $115,525
Median Home Value $480,500 $651,600
Median Rent $1,693 $1,603
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 49.3% 66.1%
Poverty Rate 9.8% 6.7%
Avg Commute 27 min 23 min

The data story: Creston Elementary School vs Stephenson Elementary School

Creston Elementary School edges Stephenson Elementary School by 0.4 points in overall rating — 9.4 versus 9.0 out of 10 — a gap that reflects real structural differences rather than a statistical tie. In Oregon's statewide rankings, Creston Elementary School lands at #19 of 1,226 schools while Stephenson Elementary School sits at #60 of 1,226, placing both schools comfortably in the top 5% of the state but with Creston holding a meaningful positional lead against a large field.

Academically, the two schools are nearly identical: Stephenson Elementary School scores 9.9/10 versus Creston Elementary School's 9.8/10 — a difference too small to drive a decision either way. Where separation emerges is in student growth: Creston Elementary School's growth score of 9.7/10 outpaces Stephenson Elementary School's 8.9/10 by 0.8 points. Growth scores measure how much students improve relative to academic peers with similar starting points, making that gap a signal that Creston's students are consistently outpacing expectations regardless of where they begin.

The demographic contrast between the two schools is stark. Creston Elementary School enrolls 238 students with 78% qualifying for free or reduced lunch, indicating a substantially higher-need population. Stephenson Elementary School enrolls 310 students with only 12% on free or reduced lunch. The student-teacher ratio compounds this: Creston Elementary School runs 15.9 students per teacher versus Stephenson Elementary School's 20.7:1, meaning Creston students receive meaningfully more individual attention — a 4.8-student-per-teacher advantage that translates directly into classroom time.

Both schools serve kindergarten through fifth grade and sit 5.7 miles apart within Portland. The differences here are not in grade structure or programming breadth but in class size, population served, and growth trajectory. Creston's smaller classes and higher FRL rate alongside a 9.7 growth score suggest a school that is actively outperforming its resource context. Stephenson's near-perfect academic score reflects a well-resourced student body achieving at a high absolute level.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Creston Elementary School

Creston Elementary School suits families who prioritize individual attention and demonstrated student growth over raw academic standing. With a 15.9:1 student-teacher ratio and a 9.7 growth score, it serves students who benefit from smaller classrooms and a school that consistently pushes kids beyond baseline expectations — including those arriving with greater academic need.

Stephenson Elementary School

Stephenson Elementary School fits families whose children are academically strong from the start and who value a high-achieving peer cohort. Its 9.9 academic score and low FRL rate of 12% reflect a school where incoming proficiency levels are already elevated — an environment well-suited to students unlikely to need intensive intervention support.

More Comparisons