Skip to main content

Glencoe Elementary School vs Lent Elementary School

Glencoe Elementary School and Lent Elementary School are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.3 out of 10. In math proficiency, Glencoe Elementary School leads at 64.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Glencoe Elementary School Lent Elementary School
Overall Rating 9.3 / 10 9.3 / 10
Academic Score 9.9 8.1
Growth Score 9.6 9.9
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 21% 72.9%
Environment Score 7.6 9.6
State Rank #20 of 1,226 #21 of 1,226
State Percentile 99th 98th

Test Scores

Subject Glencoe Elementary School Lent Elementary School
Math Proficiency 64.0% 15.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 75.0% 25.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Glencoe Elementary School Lent Elementary School
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 372 273
Student-Teacher Ratio 18.6:1 13.7:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 21.0% 72.9%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Portland SD 1J Portland SD 1J
City Portland Portland

Neighborhood

Metric Portland (97215) Portland (97266)
Median Household Income $114,361 $71,791
Median Home Value $658,500 $420,800
Median Rent $1,587 $1,532
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 64.1% 29.0%
Poverty Rate 7.8% 18.2%
Avg Commute 25 min 27 min

The data story: Glencoe Elementary School vs Lent Elementary School

Glencoe Elementary School and Lent Elementary School sit 3.2 miles apart in Portland, Oregon and finish nearly tied in overall quality — Glencoe at #20 of 1226 Oregon schools and Lent at #21 of 1226, both scoring 9.3/10. At that level of competition, the difference in state rank is negligible, but the two schools diverge sharply on nearly every underlying metric that drives that shared score.

The academic gap is the starkest contrast between the two schools. Glencoe Elementary School earns a 9.9/10 academic score versus Lent Elementary School's 8.1/10 — an 1.8-point difference that reflects meaningfully stronger current proficiency at Glencoe. Lent closes much of that distance through student growth: its 9.9/10 growth score edges Glencoe's already-strong 9.6/10, indicating that Lent students are making exceptional learning gains relative to their starting points. Families weighing current achievement against upward trajectory will find a genuine trade-off here.

The demographic and resource picture separates these schools considerably. Lent Elementary School serves 273 students at a 13.7:1 student-teacher ratio, meaning meaningfully more adult attention per child than Glencoe's 18.6:1 ratio across its larger 372-student enrollment. Lent also serves a much higher-need population — 73% of students qualify for free or reduced lunch compared to 21% at Glencoe Elementary School. That gap signals a very different socioeconomic composition and, for families seeking a more economically integrated school environment, a different kind of community.

Both schools serve grades KG–05, so the full elementary experience is available at either campus. The difference is in context: Glencoe's higher academic scores align with its lower-poverty enrollment, a pattern common in Oregon and nationally. Lent's exceptional growth score — 9.9/10 — stands out precisely because it is producing top-tier learning gains in a high-need population, a genuine indicator of instructional strength. For a school where 73% of students qualify for free or reduced lunch to rank #21 in the state overall is a signal worth weighting heavily.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Glencoe Elementary School

Glencoe Elementary School suits families who prioritize current academic proficiency and are comfortable in a larger school setting. Its 9.9/10 academic score and lower free/reduced lunch rate of 21% make it a strong fit for parents seeking a high-achieving peer cohort and straightforward academic benchmarks.

Lent Elementary School

Lent Elementary School suits families who value smaller class sizes — 13.7:1 versus Glencoe's 18.6:1 — and want a school demonstrating exceptional instructional effectiveness with a diverse, economically mixed student body. Its 9.9/10 growth score shows a staff consistently outperforming expectations, which matters for families prioritizing long-term learning gains over baseline proficiency numbers.

More Comparisons