Skip to main content

Jackson Elementary vs J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle

Jackson Elementary and J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.1 out of 10. J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle is significantly larger with 493 students, about 1.6× the size of Jackson Elementary (303). In math proficiency, J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle leads at 70.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Jackson Elementary J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle
Overall Rating 9.1 / 10 8.8 / 10
Academic Score 8.4 9.7
Growth Score 9.5 8.4
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 0.3% 0.3%
Environment Score 9.3 8.5
State Rank #32 of 1,785 #73 of 1,785
State Percentile 98th 96th

Test Scores

Subject Jackson Elementary J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle
Math Proficiency 37.0% 70.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 22.0% 48.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Jackson Elementary J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 5th Kindergarten – 8th
Enrollment 303 493
Student-Teacher Ratio 13.8:1 14.9:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch
Chronic Absenteeism
District Memphis-Shelby County Schools Memphis-Shelby County Schools
City Memphis Memphis

Neighborhood

Metric Memphis (38108) Memphis (38109)
Median Household Income $35,435 $36,934
Median Home Value $62,600 $76,600
Median Rent $921 $1,000
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 10.6% 13.9%
Poverty Rate 28.0% 31.6%
Avg Commute 24 min 24 min

The data story: Jackson Elementary vs J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle

Jackson Elementary and J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle sit close in Memphis's overall school ratings, but the 0.2-point gap (Jackson Elementary 9.1/10 vs. J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle 8.9/10) understates the real differences between them. Both rank among Tennessee's elite: Jackson Elementary at #47 of 1785 in Tennessee and J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle at #75 of 1785 — either is a strong choice, but they serve different family priorities.

The sharpest academic distinction runs in opposite directions depending on what you measure. J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle posts a 9.7/10 academic score — 1.3 points above Jackson Elementary's 8.4. That's a meaningful proficiency gap. Jackson Elementary flips the script on growth, scoring 9.5/10 versus J. P. Freeman's 8.4. In practical terms: Freeman's students are performing at higher tested levels right now, while Jackson's students are gaining ground faster year over year relative to their starting points.

Jackson Elementary is the smaller school, with 303 students versus J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle's 493. That smaller body translates into a tighter student-teacher ratio — 13.8:1 at Jackson versus 14.9:1 at Freeman. One fewer student per teacher may seem marginal, but at the elementary level it compounds across daily interactions. Both ratios are healthy by Tennessee standards; Jackson simply offers more per-teacher contact.

The grade-span difference is structural: Jackson Elementary serves PK–05, stopping at fifth grade, while J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle extends through eighth grade. Families who value keeping a child in one building through middle school — avoiding a transition at age 11 — have a clear answer in Freeman. Jackson's PK–05 scope also means it accepts pre-kindergarten students, which Freeman does not.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Jackson Elementary

Jackson Elementary fits families with younger children, including pre-K age, who want a smaller school with a lower student-teacher ratio and prioritize growth trajectory over current tested proficiency. If you value a tight-knit environment and a school that moves the needle on academic progress, Jackson's 9.5/10 growth score and 303-student enrollment make it the stronger match.

J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle

J. P. Freeman Elementary/Middle suits families who want high current academic performance — its 9.7/10 academic score is the top number in this comparison — and who want their child to stay in one building from kindergarten through eighth grade. The larger campus also offers more peer diversity and extracurricular depth across a broader age range.

More Comparisons