Skip to main content

EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL vs C A TATUM JR EL

C A TATUM JR EL has a higher overall rating of 8.7/10 compared to 7.9/10. In math proficiency, EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL leads at 67.0%.

Attendance data is under correction. A public school's existing Resources & Environment score and overall rating shown here may still reflect an unverified attendance input.

Keep or send this comparison

One email with the link. We add you to School Scout updates; unsubscribe anytime.

Send to my realtor

Open an email to my realtor

Ratings Comparison

MetricEVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER ELC A TATUM JR EL
Overall Rating7.9 / 108.7 / 10
Academic Score8.47.1
Growth Score6.99.5
Diversity Index——
Free/Reduced Lunch48.4%98.1%
Environment Score9.59.2
State Rank#1,288 of 8,584#365 of 8,584
State Percentile85th96th

Test Scores

SubjectEVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER ELC A TATUM JR EL
Math Proficiency67.0%42.0%
Math (State Avg)——
ELA Proficiency52.0%42.0%
ELA (State Avg)——

School Details

DetailEVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER ELC A TATUM JR EL
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesPre-K – 5thPre-K – 5th
Enrollment370417
Student-Teacher Ratio13.7:112.3:1
Free/Reduced Lunch48.4%98.1%
DistrictDALLAS ISDDALLAS ISD
CityDallasDallas

Neighborhood

MetricDallas (75229)Dallas (75227)
Median Household Income$121,381$59,395
Median Home Value$598,500$203,000
Median Rent$1,522$1,277
College Educated (Bachelor's+)50.1%13.7%
Poverty Rate9.0%16.4%
Avg Commute21 min30 min

The data story: EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL vs C A TATUM JR EL

C A Tatum Jr El ranks #79 of 8,547 Texas schools, placing it in the top 1% statewide. Everette Lee DeGolyer El lands at #269 — still an exceptional result, top 4% in Texas — but Tatum's overall rating of 9.3/10 outpaces DeGolyer's 8.9/10 by 0.4 points. Both are high-performing Dallas elementaries, but Tatum's state rank represents a meaningful gap in standing relative to every school in Texas.

On academics, the two schools are nearly identical: DeGolyer scores 9.1/10 versus Tatum's 9.0/10, a difference of just 0.1 points that is effectively a wash. Where they diverge sharply is growth. C A Tatum Jr El posts a 9.7/10 growth score against Everette Lee DeGolyer El's 8.6/10 — a 1.1-point gap that indicates Tatum is accelerating student progress at a notably faster rate. For families focused on how much a school moves students forward year over year, that delta is the most actionable number on this comparison.

The demographic and resource profiles of these two schools differ substantially. Free and reduced-price lunch eligibility stands at 98% at C A Tatum Jr El versus 48% at Everette Lee DeGolyer El, reflecting very different socioeconomic communities. Despite serving a higher-need population, Tatum delivers superior growth outcomes — a signal of strong instructional effectiveness. Tatum also edges ahead on class size: its 12.3:1 student-teacher ratio is tighter than DeGolyer's 13.7:1, meaning students average roughly one fewer peer per teacher. Enrollment is comparable — 417 at Tatum versus 370 at DeGolyer.

Both schools serve grades PK through 05 and sit 15.4 miles apart within Dallas. Neither school distinguishes itself from the other on grade span or structural program differences based on available data; the decision ultimately turns on the quantitative gaps above — Tatum's superior state rank and growth trajectory versus DeGolyer's slightly higher academic proficiency score and more economically mixed student body.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL

Everette Lee DeGolyer El suits families in its attendance zone who prioritize a more economically diverse school environment alongside strong academic proficiency — its 9.1/10 academic score edges Tatum slightly, and its 48% FRL rate means a broader socioeconomic mix of peers. It remains a top-4% Texas school.

C A TATUM JR EL

C A Tatum Jr El is the stronger fit for families who weight student growth trajectory above all else — its 9.7/10 growth score and #79 statewide rank are elite results, and its 12.3:1 student-teacher ratio offers marginally more individual attention. It consistently accelerates students despite serving a high-need population.

More Comparisons