EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL vs C A TATUM JR EL
C A TATUM JR EL has a higher overall rating of 9.3/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL leads at 67.0%.
EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL
Dallas, TX
370 students
C A TATUM JR EL
Dallas, TX
417 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL | C A TATUM JR EL |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 8.6 / 10 | 9.3 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 9.1 | 9.0 |
| Growth Score | 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 48.4% | 98.1% |
| Environment Score | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| State Rank | #384 of 8,547 | #48 of 8,547 |
| State Percentile | 96th | 100th |
Test Scores
| Subject | EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL | C A TATUM JR EL |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 67.0% | 42.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 52.0% | 42.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL | C A TATUM JR EL |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Elementary School | Elementary School |
| Grades | Pre-K – 5th | Pre-K – 5th |
| Enrollment | 370 | 417 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 13.7:1 | 12.3:1 |
| Per-Pupil Spending | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 48.4% | 98.1% |
| Chronic Absenteeism | — | — |
| District | DALLAS ISD | DALLAS ISD |
| City | Dallas | Dallas |
Neighborhood
| Metric | Dallas (75229) | Dallas (75227) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $121,381 | $59,395 |
| Median Home Value | $598,500 | $203,000 |
| Median Rent | $1,522 | $1,277 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 50.1% | 13.7% |
| Poverty Rate | 9.0% | 16.4% |
| Avg Commute | 21 min | 30 min |
The data story: EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL vs C A TATUM JR EL
C A Tatum Jr El ranks #79 of 8,547 Texas schools, placing it in the top 1% statewide. Everette Lee DeGolyer El lands at #269 — still an exceptional result, top 4% in Texas — but Tatum's overall rating of 9.3/10 outpaces DeGolyer's 8.9/10 by 0.4 points. Both are high-performing Dallas elementaries, but Tatum's state rank represents a meaningful gap in standing relative to every school in Texas.
On academics, the two schools are nearly identical: DeGolyer scores 9.1/10 versus Tatum's 9.0/10, a difference of just 0.1 points that is effectively a wash. Where they diverge sharply is growth. C A Tatum Jr El posts a 9.7/10 growth score against Everette Lee DeGolyer El's 8.6/10 — a 1.1-point gap that indicates Tatum is accelerating student progress at a notably faster rate. For families focused on how much a school moves students forward year over year, that delta is the most actionable number on this comparison.
The demographic and resource profiles of these two schools differ substantially. Free and reduced-price lunch eligibility stands at 98% at C A Tatum Jr El versus 48% at Everette Lee DeGolyer El, reflecting very different socioeconomic communities. Despite serving a higher-need population, Tatum delivers superior growth outcomes — a signal of strong instructional effectiveness. Tatum also edges ahead on class size: its 12.3:1 student-teacher ratio is tighter than DeGolyer's 13.7:1, meaning students average roughly one fewer peer per teacher. Enrollment is comparable — 417 at Tatum versus 370 at DeGolyer.
Both schools serve grades PK through 05 and sit 15.4 miles apart within Dallas. Neither school distinguishes itself from the other on grade span or structural program differences based on available data; the decision ultimately turns on the quantitative gaps above — Tatum's superior state rank and growth trajectory versus DeGolyer's slightly higher academic proficiency score and more economically mixed student body.
Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
EVERETTE LEE DEGOLYER EL
Everette Lee DeGolyer El suits families in its attendance zone who prioritize a more economically diverse school environment alongside strong academic proficiency — its 9.1/10 academic score edges Tatum slightly, and its 48% FRL rate means a broader socioeconomic mix of peers. It remains a top-4% Texas school.
C A TATUM JR EL
C A Tatum Jr El is the stronger fit for families who weight student growth trajectory above all else — its 9.7/10 growth score and #79 statewide rank are elite results, and its 12.3:1 student-teacher ratio offers marginally more individual attention. It consistently accelerates students despite serving a high-need population.