Skip to main content

JAMES BOWIE EL vs C A TATUM JR EL

JAMES BOWIE EL and C A TATUM JR EL are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.0 out of 10. In math proficiency, JAMES BOWIE EL leads at 43.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric JAMES BOWIE EL C A TATUM JR EL
Overall Rating 9.0 / 10 9.3 / 10
Academic Score 8.5 9.0
Growth Score 9.2 9.7
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 96.5% 98.1%
Environment Score 9.2 9.0
State Rank #139 of 8,547 #48 of 8,547
State Percentile 98th 100th

Test Scores

Subject JAMES BOWIE EL C A TATUM JR EL
Math Proficiency 43.0% 42.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 39.0% 42.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail JAMES BOWIE EL C A TATUM JR EL
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 5th Pre-K – 5th
Enrollment 317 417
Student-Teacher Ratio 10.2:1 12.3:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 96.5% 98.1%
Chronic Absenteeism
District DALLAS ISD DALLAS ISD
City Dallas Dallas

Neighborhood

Metric Dallas (75203) Dallas (75227)
Median Household Income $46,358 $59,395
Median Home Value $125,000 $203,000
Median Rent $1,110 $1,277
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 16.9% 13.7%
Poverty Rate 30.5% 16.4%
Avg Commute 31 min 30 min

The data story: JAMES BOWIE EL vs C A TATUM JR EL

C A Tatum Jr El ranks #48 of 8,547 Texas schools, placing it in the top 1% statewide. James Bowie El earns a respectable #139 in the same pool — still top 2% — but trails by 91 rank positions. The overall rating gap is 0.3 points, with C A Tatum Jr El scoring 9.3/10 against James Bowie El's 9.0/10. Both schools serve the same grade span (PK–05) within Dallas ISD and sit 9.3 miles apart, making them a genuine cross-town choice rather than a neighborhood rivalry.

On academic and growth measures, C A Tatum Jr El leads across both dimensions. Its academic score of 9.0/10 edges James Bowie El's 8.5/10 by half a point, and its growth score of 9.7/10 outpaces James Bowie El's 9.2/10 — a 0.5-point gap that signals students at Tatum are advancing at a faster rate relative to their starting points. That growth edge is particularly significant for families weighing long-term trajectory, not just a snapshot of where students currently perform.

Both schools serve highly similar, economically disadvantaged populations: James Bowie El at 96% free/reduced lunch and C A Tatum Jr El at 98% — a difference of two percentage points. Enrollment diverges more meaningfully: C A Tatum Jr El is the larger campus at 417 students versus James Bowie El's 317. The trade-off shows up in class density — James Bowie El's student-teacher ratio of 10.2:1 is noticeably tighter than C A Tatum Jr El's 12.3:1, meaning Bowie students get roughly two fewer classmates per teacher on average.

Both campuses operate on identical grade configurations (PK–05), so neither offers an extended range the other lacks. The distinction comes down to ranking trajectory and instructional density: Tatum posts stronger absolute scores and a higher growth rate, while Bowie offers more individualized attention through its lower student-teacher ratio and a slightly smaller overall enrollment.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

JAMES BOWIE EL

James Bowie El suits families who prioritize smaller class sizes and more direct teacher access — its 10.2:1 student-teacher ratio is measurably lower than Tatum's 12.3:1, which can matter for children who benefit from closer adult attention or who are earlier in their academic development.

C A TATUM JR EL

C A Tatum Jr El is the stronger fit for families focused on academic outcomes and growth trajectory. Its #48 state rank and 9.7/10 growth score indicate a campus where students consistently advance beyond expectations — a meaningful edge for families who treat elementary school as the foundation for later academic performance.

More Comparisons