Skip to main content

Bemiss Elementary vs Roosevelt Elementary

Roosevelt Elementary has a higher overall rating of 8.9/10 compared to 5.0/10. In math proficiency, Bemiss Elementary leads at 53.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Bemiss Elementary Roosevelt Elementary
Overall Rating 5.0 / 10 8.9 / 10
Academic Score 5.4 8.9
Growth Score 3.3 9.1
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 84.6% 55.5%
Environment Score 8.4 8.3
State Rank #1,745 of 2,228 #147 of 2,228
State Percentile 22th 93th

Test Scores

Subject Bemiss Elementary Roosevelt Elementary
Math Proficiency 53.0% 47.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 59.0% 63.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Bemiss Elementary Roosevelt Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 5th Pre-K – 6th
Enrollment 371 431
Student-Teacher Ratio 12.0:1 13.5:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 84.6% 55.5%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23) 51.5% 43.6%
District Spokane School District Spokane School District
City Spokane Spokane

Neighborhood

Metric Spokane (99207) Spokane (99204)
Median Household Income $55,548 $50,266
Median Home Value $246,800 $355,700
Median Rent $1,127 $1,103
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 16.9% 37.5%
Poverty Rate 22.4% 18.8%
Avg Commute 22 min

The data story: Bemiss Elementary vs Roosevelt Elementary

Bemiss Elementary and Roosevelt Elementary sit 3.7 miles apart in Spokane, Washington, yet they occupy meaningfully different positions in the state rankings. Roosevelt Elementary holds an overall rating of 8.8/10 and ranks #160 of 2,225 Washington schools, while Bemiss Elementary earns an 8.4/10 and ranks #274 of 2,225 — a gap of 0.4 rating points and 114 rank positions that places both schools comfortably in the top 15% statewide, with Roosevelt holding the edge.

The academic and growth scores tell two different stories. Bemiss Elementary leads on academic proficiency with a 9.7/10 versus Roosevelt Elementary's 8.9/10 — a meaningful 0.8-point gap that suggests Bemiss students are hitting grade-level benchmarks at a higher rate. Roosevelt flips that relationship on growth: its 9.4/10 growth score outpaces Bemiss Elementary's 7.9/10 by 1.5 points, indicating Roosevelt is accelerating student progress at an exceptional rate regardless of where students start. Families weighing current proficiency against year-over-year improvement will find genuine trade-offs between these two schools.

The demographic and classroom-environment differences are equally concrete. Bemiss Elementary serves 371 students with 85% qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch and a student-teacher ratio of 12.0:1 — the tightest ratio of the two. Roosevelt Elementary enrolls 431 students, with 56% on free or reduced-price lunch and a ratio of 13.5:1. The 29-percentage-point free/reduced-lunch gap signals substantially different socioeconomic compositions, and Bemiss Elementary's lower ratio means roughly two fewer students per teacher on average.

One structural distinction separates the schools at the grade level: Roosevelt Elementary extends through 6th grade while Bemiss Elementary tops out at 5th grade. Families with children who would otherwise face a middle-school transition after 5th grade may find Roosevelt's PK–06 span a meaningful continuity advantage, keeping students in a familiar environment one additional year.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Bemiss Elementary

Bemiss Elementary suits families who prioritize current academic proficiency above all else — its 9.7/10 academic score is 0.8 points higher than Roosevelt's — and who value smaller class sizes, given its 12.0:1 student-teacher ratio. It is also the stronger fit for families comfortable with a higher-poverty school environment, where 85% of students receive free or reduced-price lunch.

Roosevelt Elementary

Roosevelt Elementary suits families who want exceptional student growth — its 9.4/10 growth score outpaces Bemiss by 1.5 points — and who prefer a slightly larger school community with grade continuity through 6th grade, avoiding an early middle-school transition. Its lower free/reduced-lunch rate of 56% reflects a more mixed socioeconomic enrollment.

More Comparisons