Skip to main content

Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom vs Ashland Elementary

Ashland Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.2/10 compared to 8.7/10. In math proficiency, Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom leads at 74.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom Ashland Elementary
Overall Rating 8.7 / 10 9.2 / 10
Academic Score 9.7 9.6
Growth Score 8.7 9.5
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 0.1% 0.1%
Environment Score 7.0 7.6
State Rank #56 of 2,000 #11 of 2,000
State Percentile 97th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom Ashland Elementary
Math Proficiency 74.0% 67.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 78.0% 68.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom Ashland Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 6th Pre-K – 6th
Enrollment 626 758
Student-Teacher Ratio 17.4:1 15.5:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch
Chronic Absenteeism
District Chandler Unified District #80 (4242) Gilbert Unified District (4239)
City Gilbert Gilbert

Neighborhood

Metric Gilbert (85298) Gilbert (85295)
Median Household Income $146,688 $116,288
Median Home Value $598,300 $527,400
Median Rent $2,525 $1,965
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 50.7% 49.4%
Poverty Rate 3.2% 3.8%
Avg Commute 31 min 27 min

The data story: Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom vs Ashland Elementary

Ashland Elementary ranks #15 of 2002 Arizona schools while Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom sits at #49 of 2002 — a meaningful 34-position gap despite both schools earning strong overall ratings. Ashland's 9.3/10 overall edges Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom's 9.0/10 by 0.3 points, a difference driven primarily by growth performance rather than raw academic output.

On academic scores, the two schools are nearly identical: Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom scores 9.7/10 versus Ashland Elementary's 9.6/10, a difference of just 0.1 points. The divergence opens up sharply on growth, where Ashland Elementary scores 9.5/10 against Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom's 8.7/10 — a 0.8-point gap indicating that Ashland students make measurably faster academic progress relative to expectations regardless of where they start.

Ashland Elementary enrolls 758 students compared to Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom's 626, yet Ashland achieves a tighter student-teacher ratio of 15.5:1 versus 17.4:1 at Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom. That means Ashland classrooms average roughly two fewer students per teacher despite serving a larger total population, which likely contributes to the superior growth outcomes. Both schools serve grades PK–06 and sit 5.6 miles apart in Gilbert, Arizona, making them direct practical alternatives for most families in the area.

Both schools operate the same grade band — PK through sixth grade — so transitions and program availability are structurally equivalent. The primary distinction is Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom's traditional academic model, which produces near-ceiling academic scores, versus Ashland Elementary's edge in accelerating student growth combined with smaller class sizes. Families weighing entry-level academic rigor against demonstrated year-over-year improvement will find the contrast between these two otherwise high-performing schools comes down to that growth gap and the teacher-to-student ratio advantage Ashland holds.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom

Chandler Traditional Academy-Freedom suits families who prioritize a structured, traditional academic environment and want one of the highest raw academic scores in Arizona — 9.7/10 — even if class sizes run slightly larger at 17.4:1. It's a strong fit for children who thrive in consistent, teacher-directed settings and families already in its attendance zone or drawn to its specific instructional philosophy.

Ashland Elementary

Ashland Elementary is the better fit for families who want their child not just to perform well academically but to grow faster than expected year over year. Its 9.5/10 growth score, tighter 15.5:1 student-teacher ratio, and #15 state rank make it the stronger choice for parents whose top priority is measurable learning momentum — particularly for students who may need more individualized teacher attention.

More Comparisons