Skip to main content

Ascot Avenue Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 8.5/10 compared to 6.7/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 76.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricAscot Avenue ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating6.7 / 108.5 / 10
Academic Score7.99.5
Growth Score5.77.5
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch96.5%88.3%
Environment Score7.49.5
State Rank#4,117 of 9,539#853 of 9,539
State Percentile57th91th

Test Scores

SubjectAscot Avenue ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency54.0%76.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency39.0%64.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailAscot Avenue ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesKindergarten – 5thKindergarten – 5th
Enrollment651472
Student-Teacher Ratio20.3:118.2:1
Free/Reduced Lunch96.5%88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)44.9%21.4%
DistrictLos Angeles UnifiedLos Angeles Unified
CityLos AngelesLos Angeles

Neighborhood

MetricLos Angeles (90011)Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income$53,781$62,655
Median Home Value$575,200$1,457,200
Median Rent$1,497$1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+)6.2%40.0%
Poverty Rate26.6%18.8%
Avg Commute34 min32 min

The data story: Ascot Avenue Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary holds a state rank of #9 out of 9,533 California schools, compared to Ascot Avenue Elementary's rank of #214 — a gap that places Kim among the top 0.1% of all elementary schools statewide. Both schools sit 5.8 miles apart in Los Angeles and serve the same grade span, KG–05, making this a direct apples-to-apples comparison for families in or between their attendance zones. The 0.6-point overall rating difference (9.6 vs. 9.0) understates the actual performance distance once you look at the underlying components.

The clearest performance gap is academic: Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.5 out of 10 versus Ascot Avenue Elementary's 7.9 — a 1.6-point difference that reflects meaningfully higher tested proficiency. That said, both schools post identical growth scores of 9.8 out of 10, which means students at Ascot Avenue are advancing at the same exceptional pace as students at Kim; they are simply starting and ending at a lower absolute proficiency level. Families who prioritize trajectory over current attainment will find Ascot Avenue's growth profile genuinely competitive.

Ascot Avenue Elementary enrolls 651 students against Charles H. Kim Elementary's 472, and the larger enrollment shows up in staffing density: Ascot's student-teacher ratio is 20.3:1 versus Kim's 18.2:1, meaning Kim averages roughly two fewer students per classroom. On economic demographics, Ascot Avenue's free and reduced-price lunch rate is 96%, compared to 88% at Charles H. Kim — an 8-point difference indicating Ascot Avenue serves a more economically disadvantaged population while still achieving a top-250 statewide ranking.

Both schools are traditional elementary programs covering kindergarten through fifth grade with no structural difference in grade span. The distinction between them is not program type but performance ceiling: Kim's #9 statewide rank signals academic outcomes that are exceptionally rare at any school, in any zip code, in California.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Ascot Avenue Elementary

Ascot Avenue Elementary suits families who value exceptional student growth in a higher-need community context. Its 9.8 growth score matches Kim's exactly, and its #214 statewide rank is elite in its own right. Parents of kids who may need more individualized momentum — not just high-performing peers — will find Ascot Avenue's trajectory-focused environment a strong match.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families seeking the highest absolute academic achievement in Los Angeles. A #9 statewide rank out of 9,533 schools, a 9.5 academic score, and a lower 18.2:1 student-teacher ratio make it the right fit for parents who prioritize tested proficiency, smaller class sizes, and a peer environment concentrated among high performers.

More Comparisons