Skip to main content

Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 9.0/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 49.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 9.0 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 9.0 9.5
Growth Score 9.5 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 66.8% 88.3%
Environment Score 7.8 9.3
State Rank #217 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 98th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 47.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 47.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 364 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 22.8:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 66.8% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90048) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $104,227 $62,655
Median Home Value $1,847,500 $1,457,200
Median Rent $2,359 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 69.2% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 11.6% 18.8%
Avg Commute 25 min 32 min

The data story: Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 of 9,533 schools in California, placing it among the top 0.1% of all elementary schools in the state. Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet is itself an exceptional school at #217 of 9,533, but the gap between the two is substantial — Kim sits 208 positions higher in a field of nearly ten thousand schools. The overall rating difference is 0.6 points, with Charles H. Kim Elementary scoring 9.6/10 against Carthay's 9.0/10, a margin that reflects a consistent edge across every measured dimension.

On academics, Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.5/10 versus Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet's 9.0/10 — a half-point difference that, at this tier, represents a meaningful separation. Growth scores tell a similar story: Kim earns a 9.8/10 compared to Carthay's already-strong 9.5/10. That 0.3-point growth gap is notable because growth scores capture how much students improve year over year, controlling for where they started — Kim is accelerating students at a rate that puts it at the very top of the state.

The two schools differ sharply on demographics and classroom structure. Charles H. Kim Elementary serves a higher-need population, with 88% of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch compared to 67% at Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet — a 21-percentage-point difference. Kim also enrolls 472 students versus Carthay's 364. Despite the larger enrollment, Kim's student-teacher ratio is 18.2:1, meaningfully lower than Carthay's 22.8:1, meaning Kim students get more individual teacher attention on average. Achieving a #9 state ranking while serving a predominantly high-need population makes Kim's performance particularly striking.

Both schools serve grades KG–05 and sit just 3.6 miles apart in Los Angeles. The most structurally distinctive difference is Carthay's identity as an environmental studies magnet, which shapes its curriculum around sustainability, ecology, and place-based learning — a programmatic focus that Kim, as a traditional neighborhood elementary, does not replicate. Families who specifically want a thematic magnet environment will find that only Carthay delivers it.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet

Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet suits families who want a structured thematic curriculum centered on environmental science and sustainability, and who are seeking a smaller, magnet-program feel. Its 67% free/reduced lunch rate and magnet enrollment process attract a more economically mixed applicant pool than many LAUSD magnets. It ranks in the top 3% statewide, so academic quality is not in question — but the draw here is the environmental studies identity, not a raw performance edge.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families who prioritize peak academic outcomes and per-student classroom attention. With a #9 state ranking, a 9.8/10 growth score, and an 18.2:1 student-teacher ratio, it outperforms Carthay on every quantitative metric while serving a predominantly high-need student body — evidence that its results are driven by instruction, not demographics. Families within its attendance boundary who want the highest-performing traditional elementary in the city should look no further.

More Comparisons