Skip to main content

Castle Heights Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Castle Heights Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.2/10 compared to 8.5/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 76.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricCastle Heights ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating9.2 / 108.5 / 10
Academic Score9.89.5
Growth Score9.27.5
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch30.2%88.3%
Environment Score8.29.5
State Rank#145 of 9,539#853 of 9,539
State Percentile99th91th

Test Scores

SubjectCastle Heights ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency76.0%76.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency73.0%64.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailCastle Heights ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesKindergarten – 5thKindergarten – 5th
Enrollment513472
Student-Teacher Ratio23.3:118.2:1
Free/Reduced Lunch30.2%88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)17.0%21.4%
DistrictLos Angeles UnifiedLos Angeles Unified
CityLos AngelesLos Angeles

Neighborhood

MetricLos Angeles (90034)Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income$103,082$62,655
Median Home Value$1,395,000$1,457,200
Median Rent$2,180$1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+)64.3%40.0%
Poverty Rate9.2%18.8%
Avg Commute27 min32 min

The data story: Castle Heights Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Castle Heights Elementary ranks #68 out of 9,533 California schools while Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 out of 9,533 — a gap that makes these two Los Angeles elementaries more different in standing than their 0.3-point overall rating difference (9.3 vs. 9.6 out of 10) suggests. Charles H. Kim Elementary's position in the top 0.1 percent of California schools statewide is one of the sharpest distinctions a parent can draw between two otherwise similarly rated schools serving the same grade span.

On academics, Castle Heights Elementary edges ahead with a 9.7 versus Charles H. Kim Elementary's 9.5 out of 10 — a narrow but concrete 0.2-point lead. Growth scores are identical: both Castle Heights Elementary and Charles H. Kim Elementary score 9.8 out of 10, meaning students at each school are advancing at the same exceptional pace relative to their starting points. The academic edge at Castle Heights is real but modest; the growth parity confirms that high-progress instruction is happening at both campuses.

The demographic and equity picture separates these schools most sharply. Charles H. Kim Elementary serves 88 percent of students on free or reduced-price lunch compared to 30 percent at Castle Heights Elementary — a 58-point difference that reflects genuinely distinct communities 5.6 miles apart. The student-teacher ratio tells a parallel story: Charles H. Kim Elementary's 18.2-to-1 ratio means significantly more adult attention per child than Castle Heights Elementary's 23.3-to-1, a five-student-per-teacher gap that matters in a classroom. Total enrollment is comparable — 513 at Castle Heights versus 472 at Charles H. Kim Elementary.

Both schools serve kindergarten through fifth grade, so grade-span is not a differentiator. The decisive variable for most families will be fit: Charles H. Kim Elementary's #9 state rank alongside its high-need population represents a demonstrated model of excellence with economically diverse students, while Castle Heights Elementary's slightly stronger academic score and larger enrollment reflect a school excelling in a lower-poverty context.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Castle Heights Elementary

Castle Heights Elementary suits families in lower-poverty Los Angeles neighborhoods who want a top-100 California elementary with a slight academic score edge (9.7 vs. 9.5) and are comfortable with a larger classroom setting. Its 30 percent free-and-reduced-lunch rate and #68 state rank make it an excellent neighborhood option for middle- and higher-income households already in its attendance zone.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary is the stronger fit for families who prioritize proven outcomes for economically diverse student bodies — its #9 statewide rank while serving 88 percent free-and-reduced-lunch students is exceptional. The 18.2-to-1 student-teacher ratio also gives it a concrete structural advantage for families who want smaller class sizes and more individualized attention.

More Comparisons