Skip to main content

Castle Heights Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Castle Heights Elementary and Charles H. Kim Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.3 out of 10. In math proficiency, Castle Heights Elementary leads at 66.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Castle Heights Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 9.3 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 9.7 9.5
Growth Score 9.8 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 30.2% 88.3%
Environment Score 7.5 9.3
State Rank #68 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 99th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Castle Heights Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 66.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 71.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Castle Heights Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 513 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 23.3:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 30.2% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90034) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $103,082 $62,655
Median Home Value $1,395,000 $1,457,200
Median Rent $2,180 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 64.3% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 9.2% 18.8%
Avg Commute 27 min 32 min

The data story: Castle Heights Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Castle Heights Elementary ranks #68 out of 9,533 California schools while Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 out of 9,533 — a gap that makes these two Los Angeles elementaries more different in standing than their 0.3-point overall rating difference (9.3 vs. 9.6 out of 10) suggests. Charles H. Kim Elementary's position in the top 0.1 percent of California schools statewide is one of the sharpest distinctions a parent can draw between two otherwise similarly rated schools serving the same grade span.

On academics, Castle Heights Elementary edges ahead with a 9.7 versus Charles H. Kim Elementary's 9.5 out of 10 — a narrow but concrete 0.2-point lead. Growth scores are identical: both Castle Heights Elementary and Charles H. Kim Elementary score 9.8 out of 10, meaning students at each school are advancing at the same exceptional pace relative to their starting points. The academic edge at Castle Heights is real but modest; the growth parity confirms that high-progress instruction is happening at both campuses.

The demographic and equity picture separates these schools most sharply. Charles H. Kim Elementary serves 88 percent of students on free or reduced-price lunch compared to 30 percent at Castle Heights Elementary — a 58-point difference that reflects genuinely distinct communities 5.6 miles apart. The student-teacher ratio tells a parallel story: Charles H. Kim Elementary's 18.2-to-1 ratio means significantly more adult attention per child than Castle Heights Elementary's 23.3-to-1, a five-student-per-teacher gap that matters in a classroom. Total enrollment is comparable — 513 at Castle Heights versus 472 at Charles H. Kim Elementary.

Both schools serve kindergarten through fifth grade, so grade-span is not a differentiator. The decisive variable for most families will be fit: Charles H. Kim Elementary's #9 state rank alongside its high-need population represents a demonstrated model of excellence with economically diverse students, while Castle Heights Elementary's slightly stronger academic score and larger enrollment reflect a school excelling in a lower-poverty context.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Castle Heights Elementary

Castle Heights Elementary suits families in lower-poverty Los Angeles neighborhoods who want a top-100 California elementary with a slight academic score edge (9.7 vs. 9.5) and are comfortable with a larger classroom setting. Its 30 percent free-and-reduced-lunch rate and #68 state rank make it an excellent neighborhood option for middle- and higher-income households already in its attendance zone.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary is the stronger fit for families who prioritize proven outcomes for economically diverse student bodies — its #9 statewide rank while serving 88 percent free-and-reduced-lunch students is exceptional. The 18.2-to-1 student-teacher ratio also gives it a concrete structural advantage for families who want smaller class sizes and more individualized attention.

More Comparisons