Skip to main content

Charles White Elementary vs Hoover Street Elementary

Hoover Street Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.5/10 compared to 5.4/10. Hoover Street Elementary is significantly larger with 579 students, about 2.3× the size of Charles White Elementary (248). In math proficiency, Charles White Elementary leads at 68.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricCharles White ElementaryHoover Street Elementary
Overall Rating5.4 / 109.5 / 10
Academic Score7.39.5
Growth Score2.79.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch98%97.1%
Environment Score9.38.8
State Rank#6,609 of 9,539#31 of 9,539
State Percentile31th100th

Test Scores

SubjectCharles White ElementaryHoover Street Elementary
Math Proficiency68.0%53.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency32.0%37.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailCharles White ElementaryHoover Street Elementary
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
Grades1st – 5thKindergarten – 5th
Enrollment248579
Student-Teacher Ratio17.7:120.0:1
Free/Reduced Lunch98.0%97.1%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)31.0%28.5%
DistrictLos Angeles UnifiedLos Angeles Unified
CityLos AngelesLos Angeles

Neighborhood

MetricLos Angeles (90057)Los Angeles (90005)
Median Household Income$44,876$52,755
Median Home Value$694,500$1,084,400
Median Rent$1,395$1,648
College Educated (Bachelor's+)23.2%38.0%
Poverty Rate27.2%24.6%
Avg Commute35 min32 min

The data story: Charles White Elementary vs Hoover Street Elementary

Hoover Street Elementary holds a slight edge in overall rating, scoring 9.5/10 against Charles White Elementary's 9.1/10 — a 0.4-point gap. The difference in state standing is more pronounced: Hoover Street Elementary ranks #19 of 9,533 schools in California, while Charles White Elementary ranks #182 of the same pool. Both placements are exceptional, but Hoover Street's top-20 statewide position marks it as among California's most distinguished elementary programs.

The clearest separation between the two schools is academic proficiency. Hoover Street Elementary scores 9.5/10 on academics compared to Charles White Elementary's 7.4/10 — a 2.1-point delta that reflects a meaningful gap in tested subject mastery. Growth tells a different story: Charles White Elementary scores 9.9/10 to Hoover Street Elementary's 9.8/10, an essentially even split. Both schools are accelerating student progress at nearly identical rates; it is baseline proficiency, not momentum, that separates them.

On demographics and class size, the two schools are largely mirror images. Free and reduced lunch eligibility is 97% at Hoover Street Elementary and 98% at Charles White Elementary, making both high-poverty Title I campuses serving similar communities. The student-teacher ratio at Charles White Elementary is 17.7:1 versus 20.0:1 at Hoover Street Elementary, giving Charles White a modest per-pupil staffing advantage. Enrollment differs more sharply: Hoover Street Elementary serves 579 students, more than twice the 248 enrolled at Charles White Elementary, which operates as a notably smaller campus.

One structural distinction affects families with kindergarteners: Hoover Street Elementary serves grades KG through 5, while Charles White Elementary begins at grade 1 and runs through grade 5, meaning Charles White does not offer a kindergarten program. The two schools sit only 0.4 miles apart in Los Angeles, making the grade-span difference the most operationally significant factor for families of incoming kindergarteners choosing between them.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Charles White Elementary

Hoover Street Elementary suits families who prioritize the highest possible academic proficiency floor — its 9.5/10 academic score and #19 California ranking signal a school performing at an elite level. It also works for families enrolling a kindergartener, since Charles White Elementary does not offer KG. The larger campus may suit families who value broader peer networks and extracurricular depth.

Hoover Street Elementary

Charles White Elementary suits families who prefer a smaller, tighter-knit campus — 248 students versus 579 — and a slightly lower student-teacher ratio of 17.7:1. Its near-perfect growth score of 9.9/10 makes it a strong fit for families prioritizing continuous progress over incoming proficiency levels. Parents who want their child known individually by teachers will find the smaller enrollment meaningful.

More Comparisons