Skip to main content

Hoover Street Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Hoover Street Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.5/10 compared to 8.5/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 76.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricHoover Street ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating9.5 / 108.5 / 10
Academic Score9.59.5
Growth Score9.87.5
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch97.1%88.3%
Environment Score8.89.5
State Rank#31 of 9,539#853 of 9,539
State Percentile100th91th

Test Scores

SubjectHoover Street ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency53.0%76.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency37.0%64.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailHoover Street ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesKindergarten – 5thKindergarten – 5th
Enrollment579472
Student-Teacher Ratio20.0:118.2:1
Free/Reduced Lunch97.1%88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)28.5%21.4%
DistrictLos Angeles UnifiedLos Angeles Unified
CityLos AngelesLos Angeles

Neighborhood

MetricLos Angeles (90005)Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income$52,755$62,655
Median Home Value$1,084,400$1,457,200
Median Rent$1,648$1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+)38.0%40.0%
Poverty Rate24.6%18.8%
Avg Commute32 min32 min

The data story: Hoover Street Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Hoover Street Elementary and Charles H. Kim Elementary are separated by just 1.6 miles in Los Angeles, yet their state rankings tell a meaningful story: Charles H. Kim Elementary sits at #9 of 9,533 California schools while Hoover Street Elementary ranks #19 of 9,533 — both extraordinary placements, with Kim holding a 10-spot edge statewide. The overall rating gap is just 0.1 points, Charles H. Kim Elementary at 9.6/10 versus Hoover Street Elementary at 9.5/10, making this one of the tightest comparisons a parent will encounter at this level.

On academic and growth measures, the two schools are effectively identical. Both Hoover Street Elementary and Charles H. Kim Elementary score 9.5/10 on academics and 9.8/10 on growth — meaning students at each school are advancing at an exceptional pace relative to peers statewide. Parents should not expect a material difference in measured academic outcomes between these two campuses. The distinction lies in the surrounding context, not the performance numbers.

Charles H. Kim Elementary enrolls 472 students compared to Hoover Street Elementary's 579, a difference of 107 students across the same KG–05 grade span. That smaller enrollment translates directly into a tighter student-teacher ratio: 18.2:1 at Charles H. Kim Elementary versus 20.0:1 at Hoover Street Elementary. The free and reduced-price lunch rate diverges more sharply — 97% at Hoover Street Elementary against 88% at Charles H. Kim Elementary — indicating Hoover Street serves a higher concentration of economically disadvantaged families.

Both schools cover the same grade band, KG through 5th grade, so neither offers an extended grade advantage. The equity gap — a 9-percentage-point difference in FRL rates — is the sharpest demographic contrast between them, and it gives Hoover Street Elementary's near-identical academic scores additional weight: the school is producing top-20 statewide results with a nearly fully economically disadvantaged student population.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Hoover Street Elementary

Hoover Street Elementary suits families who prioritize a school that demonstrably closes opportunity gaps — it achieves #19 in California with 97% of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch. If your child will join a predominantly low-income peer group and you want evidence the school delivers elite outcomes for that population, Hoover Street makes a compelling case.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families who want the highest state ranking available in this part of Los Angeles — #9 in California — combined with a smaller campus (472 students) and a lower student-teacher ratio of 18.2:1. Parents who weigh class size and want a marginally less crowded environment with an equivalent academic trajectory will find Kim the stronger fit.

More Comparisons