Skip to main content

Christopher Dena Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.9/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 49.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Christopher Dena Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 8.9 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 7.6 9.5
Growth Score 9.5 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 93.8% 88.3%
Environment Score 9.4 9.3
State Rank #279 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 97th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Christopher Dena Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 24.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 34.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Christopher Dena Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 6th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 337 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 17.7:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 93.8% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90023) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $56,623 $62,655
Median Home Value $617,600 $1,457,200
Median Rent $1,414 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 10.2% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 21.9% 18.8%
Avg Commute 30 min 32 min

The data story: Christopher Dena Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 of 9,533 schools in California, compared to Christopher Dena Elementary's #279 — a gap that places Kim in the top 0.1% of the state while Dena sits in the top 3%. Their overall ratings reflect this: Kim scores 9.6/10 against Dena's 8.9/10, a 0.7-point difference that, in context of California's full distribution, represents a meaningful separation in measured school quality.

The academic score delta is the sharpest distinction between these two schools. Charles H. Kim Elementary earns a 9.5/10 in academics versus Christopher Dena Elementary's 7.6/10 — a 1.9-point gap that signals a substantial difference in tested proficiency outcomes. Growth scores tell a different story: both schools perform strongly, with Kim at 9.8/10 and Dena at 9.5/10, a near-negligible 0.3-point spread. Dena's strong growth score relative to its academic score suggests students there are making meaningful year-over-year gains from wherever they start.

Christopher Dena Elementary serves 337 students with a 94% free and reduced lunch rate; Charles H. Kim Elementary enrolls 472 students at 88% FRL. Both schools serve predominantly high-need populations, and the six-point FRL difference is modest. Student-teacher ratios are similar — Dena at 17.7:1 versus Kim at 18.2:1 — meaning classroom-level adult attention is roughly comparable at both campuses despite the enrollment gap.

The two schools diverge on grade span: Christopher Dena Elementary serves kindergarten through sixth grade, while Charles H. Kim Elementary runs kindergarten through fifth only. Families with a rising sixth-grader would face a middle school transition one year earlier at Kim. Both campuses sit 6.5 miles apart within Los Angeles, so geographic convenience will factor differently depending on a family's neighborhood, though neither school is the obvious proximity choice for every household in the city.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Christopher Dena Elementary

Christopher Dena Elementary fits families who prioritize documented student growth over absolute proficiency levels — its 9.5/10 growth score shows strong academic momentum. It also suits households with a student heading into sixth grade who want to delay the middle school transition by one year, given Dena's KG–06 grade span versus Kim's KG–05.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families where maximizing academic proficiency benchmarks is the top priority — its #9 statewide rank and 9.5/10 academic score are among the highest any California elementary can offer. With 472 students, it also offers a slightly larger peer community, which matters for families who value a wider social environment in the early grades.

More Comparisons