Skip to main content

Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.8/10. Charles H. Kim Elementary is significantly larger with 472 students, about 3.6× the size of Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet (131). In math proficiency, Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet leads at 57.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 8.8 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 9.1 9.5
Growth Score 8.5 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 52.7% 88.3%
Environment Score 9.2 9.3
State Rank #357 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 96th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 57.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 62.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 131 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 18.7:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 52.7% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90039) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $105,578 $62,655
Median Home Value $1,202,000 $1,457,200
Median Rent $2,149 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 56.6% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 8.7% 18.8%
Avg Commute 30 min 32 min

The data story: Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary outranks Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet by a wide margin in California's statewide standings: Kim sits at #9 of 9,533 California elementary schools while Clifford Street ranks #357 — a 348-position gap that reflects a meaningful performance difference between two schools separated by only 3.1 miles in Los Angeles. The overall rating difference of 0.8 points (9.6 vs. 8.8 out of 10) understates the spread at the top of the distribution, where incremental gains are increasingly difficult to achieve.

Academically, Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.5 out of 10 versus Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet's 9.1, a 0.4-point difference that places both schools in elite territory — but Kim's growth score is where the gap widens most. Kim earns a 9.8 out of 10 on student growth compared to Clifford Street's 8.5, a 1.3-point delta indicating that Kim students are accelerating relative to academic peers at a substantially higher rate. For families weighing long-term trajectory alongside current achievement, that growth differential carries real weight.

The two schools diverge sharply on demographics and scale. Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet enrolls 131 students — a notably small campus — while Charles H. Kim Elementary serves 472. Student-teacher ratios are similar (18.7:1 at Clifford Street vs. 18.2:1 at Kim), so class size alone doesn't explain the performance gap. The free and reduced-price lunch rates tell different stories about the communities served: 53% at Clifford Street compared to 88% at Kim. Kim's top-decile rankings are achieved with a high-need population, making its performance particularly notable as a measure of instructional effectiveness.

Both schools serve kindergarten through fifth grade on the same grade-band footing. Clifford Street's explicit Math & Technology Magnet designation sets it apart programmatically — it operates as a district magnet with a defined STEM focus, which drives its smaller, application-eligible enrollment. Kim functions as a neighborhood school delivering exceptional outcomes at more than three times the enrollment, without a specialized programmatic filter.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet

Clifford Street Elementary Math & Technology Magnet suits families who specifically want a structured STEM magnet environment with a smaller school footprint and an intentional math and technology curriculum — and are willing to navigate the magnet application process to access it. Its 131-student enrollment appeals to parents who prioritize an intimate campus feel alongside a focused academic identity.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary is the stronger fit for families seeking the highest-performing neighborhood elementary in Los Angeles without magnet enrollment hurdles. Its #9 statewide rank and 9.8 growth score — achieved with 88% of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch — signal exceptional teaching quality accessible to the full surrounding community.

More Comparisons