Skip to main content

Everest Value vs Canfield Avenue Elementary

Canfield Avenue Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.5/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, Canfield Avenue Elementary leads at 62.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Everest Value Canfield Avenue Elementary
Overall Rating 8.6 / 10 9.5 / 10
Academic Score 8.5 9.7
Growth Score 8.3 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.8% 48.6%
Environment Score 9.3 8.5
State Rank #509 of 9,533 #17 of 9,533
State Percentile 95th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Everest Value Canfield Avenue Elementary
Math Proficiency 47.0% 62.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 42.0% 67.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Everest Value Canfield Avenue Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 8th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 352 296
Student-Teacher Ratio 19.6:1 21.1:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.8% 48.6%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Everest Value District Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90004) Los Angeles (90035)
Median Household Income $62,655 $108,224
Median Home Value $1,457,200 $1,844,000
Median Rent $1,752 $2,486
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 40.0% 68.0%
Poverty Rate 18.8% 7.8%
Avg Commute 32 min 26 min

The data story: Everest Value vs Canfield Avenue Elementary

Canfield Avenue Elementary outranks Everest Value by a substantial margin in California's statewide standings: Canfield Avenue Elementary sits at #63 of 9,533 California schools while Everest Value ranks #641 of 9,533 — a gap of 578 positions. On the 10-point overall scale, Canfield Avenue Elementary scores 9.4 versus Everest Value's 8.6, a difference of 0.8 points. Both schools clear the bar for strong schools, but Canfield Avenue Elementary consistently places in the top 1% of the state, making the performance gap meaningful for parents prioritizing academic outcomes.

The academic and growth data reinforce that separation. Canfield Avenue Elementary holds a 9.7 academic score against Everest Value's 8.5 — a 1.2-point delta — and a 9.8 growth score against Everest Value's 8.3, a 1.5-point gap. Growth scores measure how much students advance relative to academic peers year over year, so Canfield Avenue Elementary's 9.8 signals that students are gaining ground at a pace that ranks among California's best, regardless of where they start.

The two schools serve meaningfully different populations. Everest Value enrolls 352 students with 86% qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch, indicating a high-need community. Canfield Avenue Elementary enrolls 296 students with 49% on free or reduced-price lunch. On classroom density, Everest Value's student-teacher ratio is 19.6:1 compared to Canfield Avenue Elementary's 21.1:1 — Everest Value actually offers slightly more adult attention per student despite its larger enrollment.

Structurally, the schools differ in type, grade span, and governance. Everest Value is a charter school serving kindergarten through eighth grade, meaning families who enroll there can stay through middle school without a transition. Canfield Avenue Elementary is a traditional public school covering kindergarten through fifth grade only, so families will need to plan a middle school move after fifth grade. Charter status at Everest Value typically involves an enrollment lottery and may draw from a broader geographic zone rather than a fixed attendance boundary.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Everest Value

Everest Value suits families seeking a single-campus K–8 path that avoids a middle school transition, particularly those in a high-need community who want a charter option with slightly smaller class sizes (19.6:1). The school's strong statewide rank of #641 still places it well above average among California's 9,533 schools.

Canfield Avenue Elementary

Canfield Avenue Elementary is the stronger academic pick for families who prioritize top-tier performance — its #63 statewide rank, 9.7 academic score, and 9.8 growth score put it in California's top 1%. It fits families zoned to its attendance boundary who want a traditional public K–5 and are prepared to research middle school options separately.

More Comparisons