Skip to main content

Everest Value vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 49.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Everest Value Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 8.6 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 8.5 9.5
Growth Score 8.3 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.8% 88.3%
Environment Score 9.3 9.3
State Rank #509 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 95th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Everest Value Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 47.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 42.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Everest Value Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 8th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 352 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 19.6:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.8% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Everest Value District Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90004) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $62,655 $62,655
Median Home Value $1,457,200 $1,457,200
Median Rent $1,752 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 40.0% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 18.8% 18.8%
Avg Commute 32 min 32 min

The data story: Everest Value vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 of 9,533 California schools, compared to Everest Value's #509 — a gap of 500 positions in the state rankings that translates directly to the overall rating difference: 9.6/10 for Charles H. Kim Elementary versus 8.6/10 for Everest Value, a 1.0-point spread between two schools just 1.2 miles apart in Los Angeles.

The academic data reinforces that gap. Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.5/10 in academics against Everest Value's 8.5/10, a full point apart. The growth score diverges even more sharply: Charles H. Kim Elementary earns a 9.8/10 in student growth versus Everest Value's 8.3/10 — a 1.5-point delta suggesting Kim's students are outpacing academic expectations at a significantly higher rate relative to their peers, regardless of starting point.

Both schools serve populations with very similar economic need: Everest Value's free and reduced lunch rate is 86%, Charles H. Kim Elementary's is 88%, making them nearly identical on that dimension. Enrollment differs more — Charles H. Kim Elementary serves 472 students to Everest Value's 352 — and Charles H. Kim's student-teacher ratio of 18.2:1 is modestly tighter than Everest Value's 19.6:1, meaning slightly more individual attention per student on average.

The most concrete structural difference between the two schools is grade span and school type. Everest Value is a charter school serving grades KG through 8, so a family enrolling in kindergarten can stay through middle school without a transition. Charles H. Kim Elementary is a traditional LAUSD public school serving only grades KG through 5, after which families navigate a separate middle school placement. Parents who value continuity and a single-campus experience through 8th grade will find Everest Value's model distinct, even as Charles H. Kim Elementary leads on every performance metric available.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Everest Value

Everest Value suits families who want a single K–8 campus — eliminating one school transition — and are comfortable with a charter school model. Its 8.6/10 rating and #509 state rank make it a strong school in absolute terms, and the extended grade span is a concrete logistical advantage for parents planning ahead through middle school.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families who prioritize raw academic performance and student growth above all else. A 9.6/10 rating and #9 state rank in California put it in elite company for a school serving a high-need population. Parents willing to manage a separate middle school transition at 5th grade gain access to one of the highest-performing elementary schools in Los Angeles.

More Comparisons