Skip to main content

Field Elementary vs Sequoia Elementary

Field Elementary has a higher overall rating of 8.8/10 compared to 6.9/10. In math proficiency, Sequoia Elementary leads at 67.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricField ElementarySequoia Elementary
Overall Rating8.8 / 106.9 / 10
Academic Score8.38.8
Growth Score9.55.0
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch65.8%65.9%
Environment Score7.99.0
State Rank#521 of 9,539#3,773 of 9,539
State Percentile95th61th

Test Scores

SubjectField ElementarySequoia Elementary
Math Proficiency52.0%67.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency47.0%67.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailField ElementarySequoia Elementary
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesKindergarten – 6thKindergarten – 6th
Enrollment263170
Student-Teacher Ratio20.2:117.0:1
Free/Reduced Lunch65.8%65.9%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)35.4%38.8%
DistrictSan Diego UnifiedSan Diego Unified
CitySan DiegoSan Diego

Neighborhood

MetricSan Diego (92117)San Diego (92117)
Median Household Income$105,286$105,286
Median Home Value$914,400$914,400
Median Rent$2,115$2,115
College Educated (Bachelor's+)50.7%50.7%
Poverty Rate10.4%10.4%
Avg Commute21 min21 min

The data story: Field Elementary vs Sequoia Elementary

Field Elementary and Sequoia Elementary sit 1.1 miles apart in San Diego, California, yet their overall ratings tell a meaningful story: Sequoia Elementary scores 9.4/10 against Field Elementary's 8.7/10 — a 0.7-point gap that translates into a dramatic difference in state standing. Field Elementary ranks #607 of 9,533 California elementary schools, a strong result by any measure. Sequoia Elementary ranks #79 of 9,533, placing it in the top 1% of every elementary school in the state.

The academic and growth numbers sharpen that picture. On academic proficiency, Sequoia Elementary scores 8.8/10 versus Field Elementary's 8.3/10 — a half-point gap that reflects measurably higher test performance. The growth score gap is wider still: Sequoia Elementary earns a 9.8/10 compared to Field Elementary's 9.1/10, meaning students at Sequoia are advancing at a faster rate relative to their peers statewide. Both scores favor Sequoia, and the growth advantage suggests the gap isn't just about incoming student preparation — instruction is accelerating outcomes at a higher clip.

On demographics and classroom structure, the two schools are more similar than the rating gap implies. Both serve identical grade bands — kindergarten through sixth grade — and both report exactly 66% of students qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch, meaning neither school serves a more affluent population than the other. Where they diverge is size and staffing: Field Elementary enrolls 263 students at a 20.2:1 student-teacher ratio, while Sequoia Elementary serves 170 students at a 17.0:1 ratio. That smaller class load at Sequoia translates to roughly three fewer students per teacher — a structural advantage that likely contributes to its higher growth scores.

Both schools share the same grade span, the same neighborhood city, and the same economic profile of families served. The differences are concentrated in outcomes: Sequoia Elementary's top-1% state ranking and superior growth score represent a genuine performance edge, not a demographic artifact. Field Elementary's #607 statewide rank is legitimately strong for a school serving a majority low-income population, but families for whom academic acceleration is the top priority will find Sequoia's numbers harder to match within this radius.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Field Elementary

Field Elementary suits families who value a larger school community — 263 students compared to Sequoia's 170 — and are comfortable with a slightly higher student-teacher ratio in exchange for a school that still ranks in California's top 7% while serving a comparable low-income population. It's a strong neighborhood option for families who may not have the flexibility to access Sequoia's attendance zone.

Sequoia Elementary

Sequoia Elementary is the stronger fit for families who prioritize measurable academic acceleration — its 9.8/10 growth score and top-1% California ranking are rare at any income level, and its 17.0:1 student-teacher ratio offers more individual attention than Field. Families who can access its zone and want the highest-performing elementary within this 1.1-mile corridor should make Sequoia their first choice.

More Comparisons