Skip to main content

Franklin Avenue Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.8/10. In math proficiency, Franklin Avenue Elementary leads at 71.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Franklin Avenue Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 8.8 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 9.6 9.5
Growth Score 9.0 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 27.7% 88.3%
Environment Score 7.3 9.3
State Rank #360 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 96th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Franklin Avenue Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 71.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 77.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Franklin Avenue Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 405 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 23.8:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 27.7% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90027) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $90,532 $62,655
Median Home Value $1,747,200 $1,457,200
Median Rent $1,904 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 58.2% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 14.2% 18.8%
Avg Commute 29 min 32 min

The data story: Franklin Avenue Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Franklin Avenue Elementary ranks #360 of 9,533 California schools while Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 of 9,533 — a gap that situates both schools in the top tier statewide, though Charles H. Kim sits in a different category entirely. The overall rating gap is 0.8 points, with Charles H. Kim Elementary scoring 9.6/10 against Franklin Avenue Elementary's 8.8/10, and that difference is driven almost entirely by growth rather than raw academic output.

Academically, the two schools are nearly identical: Franklin Avenue Elementary scores 9.6/10 versus Charles H. Kim Elementary's 9.5/10 — a negligible one-tenth-point difference. Where Charles H. Kim separates itself is growth, scoring 9.8/10 compared to Franklin Avenue Elementary's 9.0/10. That 0.8-point growth gap suggests Charles H. Kim is consistently moving students further along the learning curve year over year, regardless of where they start.

The demographic profiles of these two schools diverge sharply. Franklin Avenue Elementary serves 405 students with 28% qualifying for free or reduced lunch, while Charles H. Kim Elementary serves 472 students with 88% qualifying — a 60-percentage-point difference that reflects fundamentally different community contexts. Charles H. Kim's stronger growth score is especially notable given it serves a much higher proportion of economically disadvantaged students. Student-teacher ratio also favors Charles H. Kim at 18.2:1 versus Franklin Avenue Elementary's 23.8:1 — a difference of 5.6 students per teacher that translates to more individual attention per child.

Both schools serve grades KG through 05 and sit just 2.8 miles apart in Los Angeles. The programmatic offerings and grade structures are identical on paper, which makes the growth score and student-teacher ratio the most actionable distinctions for parents weighing a choice between them.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Franklin Avenue Elementary

Franklin Avenue Elementary suits families in lower-FRL neighborhoods who prioritize a top academic score — its 9.6/10 academic rating edges out Charles H. Kim by a tenth of a point — and are comfortable with a larger classroom ratio of 23.8 students per teacher. It's a strong fit for students who enter school already performing at or above grade level.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary is the stronger fit for families who want a school with exceptional growth outcomes — 9.8/10 — and a significantly lower student-teacher ratio of 18.2:1. Its #9 statewide rank out of 9,533 schools, achieved while serving a population that is 88% economically disadvantaged, signals an unusually effective teaching environment for students at any starting point.

More Comparisons