Skip to main content

Franklin Avenue Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Franklin Avenue Elementary and Charles H. Kim Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 8.9 out of 10. In math proficiency, Franklin Avenue Elementary leads at 82.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricFranklin Avenue ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating8.9 / 108.5 / 10
Academic Score9.69.5
Growth Score8.87.5
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch27.7%88.3%
Environment Score7.99.5
State Rank#380 of 9,539#853 of 9,539
State Percentile96th91th

Test Scores

SubjectFranklin Avenue ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency82.0%76.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency78.0%64.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailFranklin Avenue ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesKindergarten – 5thKindergarten – 5th
Enrollment405472
Student-Teacher Ratio23.8:118.2:1
Free/Reduced Lunch27.7%88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)17.8%21.4%
DistrictLos Angeles UnifiedLos Angeles Unified
CityLos AngelesLos Angeles

Neighborhood

MetricLos Angeles (90027)Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income$90,532$62,655
Median Home Value$1,747,200$1,457,200
Median Rent$1,904$1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+)58.2%40.0%
Poverty Rate14.2%18.8%
Avg Commute29 min32 min

The data story: Franklin Avenue Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Franklin Avenue Elementary ranks #360 of 9,533 California schools while Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 of 9,533 — a gap that situates both schools in the top tier statewide, though Charles H. Kim sits in a different category entirely. The overall rating gap is 0.8 points, with Charles H. Kim Elementary scoring 9.6/10 against Franklin Avenue Elementary's 8.8/10, and that difference is driven almost entirely by growth rather than raw academic output.

Academically, the two schools are nearly identical: Franklin Avenue Elementary scores 9.6/10 versus Charles H. Kim Elementary's 9.5/10 — a negligible one-tenth-point difference. Where Charles H. Kim separates itself is growth, scoring 9.8/10 compared to Franklin Avenue Elementary's 9.0/10. That 0.8-point growth gap suggests Charles H. Kim is consistently moving students further along the learning curve year over year, regardless of where they start.

The demographic profiles of these two schools diverge sharply. Franklin Avenue Elementary serves 405 students with 28% qualifying for free or reduced lunch, while Charles H. Kim Elementary serves 472 students with 88% qualifying — a 60-percentage-point difference that reflects fundamentally different community contexts. Charles H. Kim's stronger growth score is especially notable given it serves a much higher proportion of economically disadvantaged students. Student-teacher ratio also favors Charles H. Kim at 18.2:1 versus Franklin Avenue Elementary's 23.8:1 — a difference of 5.6 students per teacher that translates to more individual attention per child.

Both schools serve grades KG through 05 and sit just 2.8 miles apart in Los Angeles. The programmatic offerings and grade structures are identical on paper, which makes the growth score and student-teacher ratio the most actionable distinctions for parents weighing a choice between them.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Franklin Avenue Elementary

Franklin Avenue Elementary suits families in lower-FRL neighborhoods who prioritize a top academic score — its 9.6/10 academic rating edges out Charles H. Kim by a tenth of a point — and are comfortable with a larger classroom ratio of 23.8 students per teacher. It's a strong fit for students who enter school already performing at or above grade level.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary is the stronger fit for families who want a school with exceptional growth outcomes — 9.8/10 — and a significantly lower student-teacher ratio of 18.2:1. Its #9 statewide rank out of 9,533 schools, achieved while serving a population that is 88% economically disadvantaged, signals an unusually effective teaching environment for students at any starting point.

More Comparisons