Learning by Design Charter vs Charles H. Kim Elementary
Learning by Design Charter and Charles H. Kim Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.2 out of 10. Charles H. Kim Elementary is significantly larger with 472 students, about 4.1× the size of Learning by Design Charter (115). In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 49.0%.
Learning by Design Charter
Los Angeles, CA
115 students
Charles H. Kim Elementary
Los Angeles, CA
472 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | Learning by Design Charter | Charles H. Kim Elementary |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 9.2 / 10 | 9.6 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 8.3 | 9.5 |
| Growth Score | 10.0 | 9.8 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 63.5% | 88.3% |
| Environment Score | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| State Rank | #100 of 9,533 | #9 of 9,533 |
| State Percentile | 99th | 100th |
Test Scores
| Subject | Learning by Design Charter | Charles H. Kim Elementary |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 25.0% | 49.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 25.0% | 60.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | Learning by Design Charter | Charles H. Kim Elementary |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Elementary School | Elementary School |
| Grades | Kindergarten – 5th | Kindergarten – 5th |
| Enrollment | 115 | 472 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 19.2:1 | 18.2:1 |
| Per-Pupil Spending | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 63.5% | 88.3% |
| Chronic Absenteeism | — | — |
| District | Learning by Design Charter District | Los Angeles Unified |
| City | Los Angeles | Los Angeles |
Neighborhood
| Metric | Los Angeles (90230) | Los Angeles (90004) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $106,827 | $62,655 |
| Median Home Value | $1,025,200 | $1,457,200 |
| Median Rent | $2,423 | $1,752 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 58.5% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Rate | 9.6% | 18.8% |
| Avg Commute | 27 min | 32 min |
The data story: Learning by Design Charter vs Charles H. Kim Elementary
Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 out of 9,533 California elementary schools, placing it in the top 0.1% statewide. Learning by Design Charter, while itself a strong performer at #100 of 9,533 in California, sits 91 positions behind. Both schools serve kindergarten through 5th grade in Los Angeles, 6.6 miles apart, making the comparison a genuine decision point for families with flexibility on commute.
On academics, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads with a 9.5/10 academic score against Learning by Design Charter's 8.3/10 — a 1.2-point gap that reflects meaningfully stronger proficiency outcomes. Learning by Design Charter flips the dynamic on growth, posting a perfect 10.0/10 growth score versus Charles H. Kim Elementary's 9.8/10, signaling that its students make exceptional year-over-year gains regardless of where they start. Parents weighing where a child enters versus how fast they'll accelerate will read these two numbers differently.
The demographic picture diverges sharply. Charles H. Kim Elementary enrolls 472 students against Learning by Design Charter's 115, making the charter school a significantly more intimate setting. Free and reduced-price lunch eligibility runs 88% at Charles H. Kim Elementary versus 64% at Learning by Design Charter, indicating Charles H. Kim Elementary serves a higher concentration of economically disadvantaged families. Student-teacher ratio is close — 18.2:1 at Charles H. Kim Elementary versus 19.2:1 at Learning by Design Charter — so neither school holds a clear structural edge on classroom size.
Both schools are elementary-only, covering the same KG–05 grade span, so the choice doesn't hinge on program breadth or level coverage. The core distinction is school type: Learning by Design Charter operates as a charter with the enrollment and operational flexibility that entails, while Charles H. Kim Elementary is a traditional Los Angeles Unified public school. Families in LAUSD attendance boundaries for Kim can enroll without an application process; Learning by Design Charter requires active enrollment and may have waitlists given its small 115-student footprint.
Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
Learning by Design Charter
Learning by Design Charter suits families who want a small, close-knit school environment — 115 students total — and prioritize demonstrated growth over absolute proficiency rankings. The perfect 10.0/10 growth score makes it a strong fit for students who are behind grade level or who thrive with more individualized attention in a charter setting where teachers can adapt curriculum more freely.
Charles H. Kim Elementary
Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families seeking a top-ranked traditional public school with a 9.5/10 academic score and a #9 statewide standing. At 472 students, it offers more classroom diversity and extracurricular breadth than the charter. It's the clearest choice for families whose child is already performing at or above grade level and who want the strongest absolute academic benchmark in the district.