Skip to main content

Murchison Street Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 9.1/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 49.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Murchison Street Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 9.1 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 7.5 9.5
Growth Score 9.9 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 97.3% 88.3%
Environment Score 9.4 9.3
State Rank #171 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 98th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Murchison Street Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 10.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 19.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Murchison Street Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 6th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 367 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 17.5:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 97.3% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90033) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $56,001 $62,655
Median Home Value $669,500 $1,457,200
Median Rent $1,391 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 14.0% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 25.9% 18.8%
Avg Commute 30 min 32 min

The data story: Murchison Street Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 of 9,533 California schools, placing it in the top 0.1% statewide. Murchison Street Elementary earns an impressive #171 of 9,533 — still top 2% in the state — but the gap between them is significant. The overall ratings reflect this: Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.6/10 against Murchison Street Elementary's 9.1/10, a 0.5-point difference that understates how much wider the state-rank separation actually is between these two Los Angeles schools located 6.5 miles apart.

The academic scores tell the sharpest story. Charles H. Kim Elementary holds a 9.5/10 academic score versus Murchison Street Elementary's 7.5/10 — a 2-point gap on a 10-point scale that represents a meaningful difference in tested proficiency. Growth scores, however, are virtually identical: Murchison Street Elementary posts a 9.9/10 versus Charles H. Kim Elementary's 9.8/10. That near-perfect growth score at Murchison signals that students there are advancing at an exceptional rate year over year, even as their starting proficiency levels sit lower. Families should weigh both dimensions: Kim leads on absolute academic performance, while Murchison matches or edges it on student progress.

Murchison Street Elementary serves 367 students compared to Charles H. Kim Elementary's 472, and carries a free and reduced-price lunch rate of 97% versus 88% at Kim. That 9-percentage-point FRL gap reflects meaningfully different socioeconomic compositions. Murchison's student-teacher ratio of 17.5:1 is modestly tighter than Kim's 18.2:1, offering slightly more classroom contact per student despite the higher-need population it serves.

One structural difference shapes long-term planning: Murchison Street Elementary serves grades KG–06, covering all of elementary school through sixth grade, while Charles H. Kim Elementary serves grades KG–05 only. Families enrolling at Kim will need to plan a school transition one year earlier.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Murchison Street Elementary

Murchison Street Elementary suits families who prioritize exceptional academic growth over absolute proficiency levels, or whose children need high-support, high-progress instruction. Its 9.9/10 growth score and tight student-teacher ratio of 17.5:1 make it a strong fit for students who arrive below grade level and need a school that consistently accelerates progress. The KG–06 span also eliminates a transition year.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families who want the highest available academic performance in Los Angeles — its 9.5/10 academic score and #9 statewide rank reflect consistently strong tested outcomes. It is the better fit for students already performing at or above grade level who will thrive in a high-achieving environment, and for parents who weight current proficiency over growth trajectory.

More Comparisons