Skip to main content

Parker (Jean) Elementary vs Cobb (William L.) Elementary

Parker (Jean) Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.5/10 compared to 9.0/10. In math proficiency, Parker (Jean) Elementary leads at 57.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Parker (Jean) Elementary Cobb (William L.) Elementary
Overall Rating 9.5 / 10 9.0 / 10
Academic Score 9.2 7.2
Growth Score 9.7 10.0
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 80% 66.4%
Environment Score 9.5 9.1
State Rank #30 of 9,533 #241 of 9,533
State Percentile 100th 98th

Test Scores

Subject Parker (Jean) Elementary Cobb (William L.) Elementary
Math Proficiency 57.0% 24.5%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 42.0% 15.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Parker (Jean) Elementary Cobb (William L.) Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 125 137
Student-Teacher Ratio 17.9:1 19.6:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 80.0% 66.4%
Chronic Absenteeism
District San Francisco Unified San Francisco Unified
City San Francisco San Francisco

Neighborhood

Metric San Francisco (94133) San Francisco (94115)
Median Household Income $83,025 $154,264
Median Home Value $1,519,100 $1,684,100
Median Rent $1,985 $2,380
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 54.9% 73.6%
Poverty Rate 15.9% 13.4%
Avg Commute 31 min 29 min

The data story: Parker (Jean) Elementary vs Cobb (William L.) Elementary

Parker (Jean) Elementary and Cobb (William L.) Elementary sit 1.7 miles apart in San Francisco, yet their overall ratings diverge meaningfully: Parker rates 9.5/10 against Cobb's 9.0/10. The state rank gap is more striking — Parker ranks #30 of 9,533 California schools while Cobb comes in at #241 of 9,533, placing Parker in the top 0.3% of the state versus Cobb's top 2.5%. Both are strong performers by any reasonable standard, but Parker's position is exceptional by statewide comparison.

On academic proficiency, Parker (Jean) Elementary scores 9.2/10 versus Cobb (William L.) Elementary's 7.2/10 — a two-full-point gap that reflects a concrete difference in tested subject mastery. The growth picture reverses: Cobb scores 10.0/10 on growth against Parker's 9.7/10, meaning students at Cobb are advancing at a marginally faster rate relative to academic peers. Parents weighing current achievement levels against momentum will find a genuine trade-off between these two schools, with Parker leading on absolute performance and Cobb leading on student growth trajectory.

Parker (Jean) Elementary enrolls 125 students compared to Cobb (William L.) Elementary's 137, and Parker's student-teacher ratio of 17.9:1 is tighter than Cobb's 19.6:1 — roughly 1.7 fewer students per teacher on average. On economic diversity, Parker serves a higher share of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch at 80%, compared to 66% at Cobb. Both schools serve grades KG through 5, so the grade span is identical for families with children in either range.

Both schools cover the same grade bands, eliminating transition timing as a differentiator. The practical distinction for families comes down to the academic score gap of 2.0 points and Parker's notably higher state rank, weighed against Cobb's perfect growth score of 10.0/10. Families prioritizing measurable proficiency outcomes will find Parker's lead significant; those focused on year-over-year student progress will note Cobb's slight edge in that single dimension.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Parker (Jean) Elementary

Parker (Jean) Elementary suits families who prioritize demonstrated academic proficiency and a lower student-teacher ratio of 17.9:1. Its #30 statewide rank and 9.2/10 academic score make it the stronger choice for parents whose primary criterion is current performance benchmarks rather than growth velocity.

Cobb (William L.) Elementary

Cobb (William L.) Elementary fits families who value student growth momentum — its 10.0/10 growth score edges out Parker's 9.7 — and who prefer a slightly larger peer community. At #241 statewide, it remains a high-performing school, and its lower FRL rate of 66% reflects a modestly different socioeconomic mix than Parker.

More Comparisons