Skip to main content

Vine Street Elementary vs Charles White Elementary

Vine Street Elementary and Charles White Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.2 out of 10. In math proficiency, Vine Street Elementary leads at 18.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Vine Street Elementary Charles White Elementary
Overall Rating 9.2 / 10 9.1 / 10
Academic Score 7.9 7.4
Growth Score 9.9 9.9
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.1% 98%
Environment Score 9.4 9.4
State Rank #119 of 9,533 #182 of 9,533
State Percentile 99th 98th

Test Scores

Subject Vine Street Elementary Charles White Elementary
Math Proficiency 18.0% 17.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 27.0% 22.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Vine Street Elementary Charles White Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 6th 1st – 5th
Enrollment 228 248
Student-Teacher Ratio 17.5:1 17.7:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.1% 98.0%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90038) Los Angeles (90057)
Median Household Income $61,566 $44,876
Median Home Value $1,089,200 $694,500
Median Rent $1,764 $1,395
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 40.9% 23.2%
Poverty Rate 19.5% 27.2%
Avg Commute 33 min 35 min

The data story: Vine Street Elementary vs Charles White Elementary

Vine Street Elementary and Charles White Elementary sit 3.3 miles apart in Los Angeles and are separated by just 0.1 rating points — 9.2/10 versus 9.1/10. That closeness at the top masks meaningful differences underneath. In California's statewide rankings, Vine Street Elementary places #119 of 9,533 schools while Charles White Elementary ranks #182 of 9,533, a gap of 63 positions that puts both schools firmly in the top 2% of the state.

The clearest academic difference is in proficiency scores: Vine Street Elementary holds a 7.9/10 academic score versus Charles White Elementary's 7.4/10 — a 0.5-point delta that reflects higher tested proficiency in reading and math. That distinction disappears entirely when you look at growth. Both schools score an identical 9.9/10 on student growth, meaning students at each school are advancing through grade levels at an exceptional pace regardless of where they start. Parents weighing current proficiency against year-over-year progress will find Charles White Elementary punches above its academic score on that second dimension.

The demographic and equity picture differs more sharply. Free and reduced-price lunch eligibility — a standard proxy for economic need — stands at 85% at Vine Street Elementary and 98% at Charles White Elementary, a 13-point gap indicating Charles White serves a more economically concentrated population. Enrollment is comparable (228 at Vine Street, 248 at Charles White), and student-teacher ratios are nearly identical at 17.5:1 and 17.7:1 respectively, so class size is not a differentiator. Both schools are high-poverty, high-performing outliers in the LAUSD context, which makes the growth scores especially notable.

One structural difference deserves attention before enrollment: Vine Street Elementary serves kindergarten through sixth grade, while Charles White Elementary serves only first through fifth grade. Families with incoming kindergarteners have one option — Vine Street Elementary — and families with rising sixth graders will need to plan a middle school transition a year earlier from Charles White than from Vine Street.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Vine Street Elementary

Vine Street Elementary suits families with a kindergarten-age child who want a slightly higher academic proficiency score and the option to stay in one building through sixth grade, avoiding an extra school transition. The 85% free and reduced lunch rate signals a high-need community where the school's top-2% state ranking is a particularly strong signal of instructional quality.

Charles White Elementary

Charles White Elementary suits families with a first-through-fifth grader who prioritize a school serving an extremely high-need population — 98% free and reduced lunch — while still delivering elite growth outcomes (9.9/10) and a top-200 California ranking. It fits parents who weight year-over-year student progress and community equity over absolute proficiency scores.

More Comparisons