Skip to main content

Vine Street Elementary vs Charles White Elementary

Vine Street Elementary has a higher overall rating of 7.3/10 compared to 5.4/10. In math proficiency, Charles White Elementary leads at 68.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Vine Street Elementary Charles White Elementary
Overall Rating 7.3 / 10 5.4 / 10
Academic Score 7.9 7.3
Growth Score 6.4 2.7
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.1% 98%
Environment Score 8.5 9.3
State Rank #2,941 of 9,539 #6,609 of 9,539
State Percentile 69th 31th

Test Scores

Subject Vine Street Elementary Charles White Elementary
Math Proficiency 61.0% 68.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 50.0% 32.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Vine Street Elementary Charles White Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 6th 1st – 5th
Enrollment 228 248
Student-Teacher Ratio 17.5:1 17.7:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.1% 98.0%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23) 49.1% 31.0%
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90038) Los Angeles (90057)
Median Household Income $61,566 $44,876
Median Home Value $1,089,200 $694,500
Median Rent $1,764 $1,395
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 40.9% 23.2%
Poverty Rate 19.5% 27.2%
Avg Commute 33 min 35 min

The data story: Vine Street Elementary vs Charles White Elementary

Vine Street Elementary and Charles White Elementary sit 3.3 miles apart in Los Angeles and are separated by just 0.1 rating points — 9.2/10 versus 9.1/10. That closeness at the top masks meaningful differences underneath. In California's statewide rankings, Vine Street Elementary places #119 of 9,533 schools while Charles White Elementary ranks #182 of 9,533, a gap of 63 positions that puts both schools firmly in the top 2% of the state.

The clearest academic difference is in proficiency scores: Vine Street Elementary holds a 7.9/10 academic score versus Charles White Elementary's 7.4/10 — a 0.5-point delta that reflects higher tested proficiency in reading and math. That distinction disappears entirely when you look at growth. Both schools score an identical 9.9/10 on student growth, meaning students at each school are advancing through grade levels at an exceptional pace regardless of where they start. Parents weighing current proficiency against year-over-year progress will find Charles White Elementary punches above its academic score on that second dimension.

The demographic and equity picture differs more sharply. Free and reduced-price lunch eligibility — a standard proxy for economic need — stands at 85% at Vine Street Elementary and 98% at Charles White Elementary, a 13-point gap indicating Charles White serves a more economically concentrated population. Enrollment is comparable (228 at Vine Street, 248 at Charles White), and student-teacher ratios are nearly identical at 17.5:1 and 17.7:1 respectively, so class size is not a differentiator. Both schools are high-poverty, high-performing outliers in the LAUSD context, which makes the growth scores especially notable.

One structural difference deserves attention before enrollment: Vine Street Elementary serves kindergarten through sixth grade, while Charles White Elementary serves only first through fifth grade. Families with incoming kindergarteners have one option — Vine Street Elementary — and families with rising sixth graders will need to plan a middle school transition a year earlier from Charles White than from Vine Street.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Vine Street Elementary

Vine Street Elementary suits families with a kindergarten-age child who want a slightly higher academic proficiency score and the option to stay in one building through sixth grade, avoiding an extra school transition. The 85% free and reduced lunch rate signals a high-need community where the school's top-2% state ranking is a particularly strong signal of instructional quality.

Charles White Elementary

Charles White Elementary suits families with a first-through-fifth grader who prioritize a school serving an extremely high-need population — 98% free and reduced lunch — while still delivering elite growth outcomes (9.9/10) and a top-200 California ranking. It fits parents who weight year-over-year student progress and community equity over absolute proficiency scores.

More Comparisons