Skip to main content

Vine Street Elementary vs Harvard Elementary

Vine Street Elementary and Harvard Elementary are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.2 out of 10. In math proficiency, Harvard Elementary leads at 27.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Vine Street Elementary Harvard Elementary
Overall Rating 9.2 / 10 9.2 / 10
Academic Score 7.9 8.1
Growth Score 9.9 9.7
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.1% 96%
Environment Score 9.4 9.4
State Rank #119 of 9,533 #122 of 9,533
State Percentile 99th 99th

Test Scores

Subject Vine Street Elementary Harvard Elementary
Math Proficiency 18.0% 27.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 27.0% 32.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Vine Street Elementary Harvard Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 6th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 228 250
Student-Teacher Ratio 17.5:1 17.9:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.1% 96.0%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90038) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $61,566 $62,655
Median Home Value $1,089,200 $1,457,200
Median Rent $1,764 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 40.9% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 19.5% 18.8%
Avg Commute 33 min 32 min

The data story: Vine Street Elementary vs Harvard Elementary

Vine Street Elementary and Harvard Elementary sit just 1.5 miles apart in Los Angeles and land nearly on top of each other in California's rankings — Vine Street Elementary at #119 of 9,533 schools statewide and Harvard Elementary at #122 of 9,533 — with identical overall ratings of 9.2/10. At that tier, both schools are performing in the top 1.5% of all California elementary schools, which means parents choosing between them are working with genuine differences at the margins rather than a clear quality gap.

On academics, Harvard Elementary edges Vine Street Elementary 8.1 to 7.9 — a 0.2-point gap that reflects modestly stronger measured proficiency outcomes. The growth picture flips: Vine Street Elementary scores 9.9/10 on growth versus Harvard Elementary's 9.7/10, indicating that Vine Street is pushing students forward at a fractionally faster rate relative to expectations. Neither delta is dramatic, but families prioritizing demonstrated subject-matter proficiency will find Harvard slightly stronger, while families weighing year-over-year student improvement will lean toward Vine Street.

Harvard Elementary enrolls 250 students compared to Vine Street Elementary's 228, a difference small enough that classroom feel is unlikely to diverge. Student-teacher ratios are close — 17.5:1 at Vine Street Elementary versus 17.9:1 at Harvard Elementary — meaning individual attention is effectively equivalent. The sharpest demographic difference is free and reduced-price lunch eligibility: 85% at Vine Street Elementary versus 96% at Harvard Elementary, an 11-point gap that signals Harvard Elementary serves a meaningfully higher-need population and context for interpreting its academic scores favorably.

One structural distinction matters for families with children in upper elementary grades: Vine Street Elementary serves kindergarten through sixth grade, while Harvard Elementary's program ends at fifth grade. A family with a rising sixth-grader would need to plan a school transition one year earlier at Harvard Elementary than at Vine Street Elementary, which carries that cohort through the end of elementary school in one placement.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Vine Street Elementary

Vine Street Elementary fits families with a child who will stay through sixth grade and wants to avoid a school transition before middle school. Its slightly lower student-teacher ratio and top-tier growth score also make it a strong match for parents who weight academic momentum — how much students improve each year — over absolute proficiency benchmarks.

Harvard Elementary

Harvard Elementary suits families whose child is in kindergarten through fourth grade and who prioritize slightly higher academic proficiency scores. Its 96% free and reduced-price lunch rate also means it is well-practiced at serving students who need additional academic support — a meaningful signal for families navigating resource gaps or learning differences.

More Comparisons