Skip to main content

Weigand Avenue Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 49.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Weigand Avenue Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 8.6 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 7.0 9.5
Growth Score 9.8 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 99.4% 88.3%
Environment Score 8.1 9.3
State Rank #553 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 94th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Weigand Avenue Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 19.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 17.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Weigand Avenue Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 309 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 22.1:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 99.4% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90002) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $56,158 $62,655
Median Home Value $502,600 $1,457,200
Median Rent $1,509 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 8.1% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 23.4% 18.8%
Avg Commute 35 min 32 min

The data story: Weigand Avenue Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Weigand Avenue Elementary ranks #553 of 9,533 schools in California with an overall rating of 8.6/10, while Charles H. Kim Elementary sits at #9 of 9,533 with a 9.6/10 — a 1.0-point overall gap that places Kim among the very top elementary schools in the state. For parents prioritizing elite standing within California's public school landscape, that distance between rank 553 and rank 9 is substantial, even if both schools clear a high bar in absolute terms.

The academic score delta drives most of that gap. Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.5/10 on academics versus Weigand Avenue Elementary's 7.0/10 — a 2.5-point difference that reflects meaningfully stronger proficiency outcomes at Kim. Growth, however, tells a different story: both schools score an identical 9.8/10, indicating that Weigand Avenue Elementary produces exceptional student progress from its starting point, matching Kim's growth performance despite the academic score gap.

The two schools serve demographically similar but not identical populations across Los Angeles. Weigand Avenue Elementary enrolls 309 students with 99% qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch; Charles H. Kim Elementary enrolls 472 students with 88% on free or reduced-price lunch. The student-teacher ratio at Weigand Avenue Elementary is 22.1:1 compared to 18.2:1 at Charles H. Kim Elementary — nearly four fewer students per teacher at Kim, which translates to more individualized attention in the classroom day-to-day. Both schools serve grades KG–05.

Both are traditional KG–05 elementary programs located about 10 miles apart in Los Angeles. The key structural difference is classroom load: Kim's lower student-teacher ratio of 18.2:1 versus Weigand's 22.1:1 gives it a structural staffing advantage that likely supports its stronger academic proficiency scores, even as Weigand's near-perfect growth score of 9.8/10 signals that its teachers are extracting exceptional academic progress from every student enrolled.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Weigand Avenue Elementary

Weigand Avenue Elementary suits families who value demonstrated growth over raw proficiency — its 9.8/10 growth score matches Kim's top-ranked performance, meaning students make exceptional academic progress year over year. It's the right fit for parents in its immediate community whose children will benefit from a school that maximizes development from wherever a student starts.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families who want both high proficiency outcomes and strong growth in a larger-enrollment school with better staffing ratios. At #9 in California out of 9,533 schools, it's the clear choice for parents who can access it and are prioritizing academic achievement ceilings alongside classroom attention.

More Comparisons