Skip to main content

William R. Anton Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 8.5/10 compared to 7.0/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 76.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricWilliam R. Anton ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating7.0 / 108.5 / 10
Academic Score7.39.5
Growth Score6.37.5
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch95%88.3%
Environment Score8.29.5
State Rank#3,502 of 9,539#853 of 9,539
State Percentile63th91th

Test Scores

SubjectWilliam R. Anton ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency54.0%76.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency38.0%64.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailWilliam R. Anton ElementaryCharles H. Kim Elementary
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesKindergarten – 6thKindergarten – 5th
Enrollment456472
Student-Teacher Ratio19.8:118.2:1
Free/Reduced Lunch95.0%88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)39.9%21.4%
DistrictLos Angeles UnifiedLos Angeles Unified
CityLos AngelesLos Angeles

Neighborhood

MetricLos Angeles (90063)Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income$71,725$62,655
Median Home Value$619,100$1,457,200
Median Rent$1,489$1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+)12.8%40.0%
Poverty Rate16.7%18.8%
Avg Commute31 min32 min

The data story: William R. Anton Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 out of 9,533 California schools, placing it in the top fraction of a percent statewide. William R. Anton Elementary earns a respectable #442 in the same pool — top 5% — but the overall rating gap between these two Los Angeles elementaries is 0.9 points, with Kim at 9.6/10 and Anton at 8.7/10. For parents who prioritize state-level standing, that gap is meaningful: Kim sits more than 430 positions higher in a field of nearly ten thousand schools.

The academic score delta is the sharpest dividing line between the two schools. Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.5/10 academically against William R. Anton Elementary's 7.3/10 — a 2.2-point gap that reflects concrete differences in tested proficiency. Growth tells a tighter story: Anton earns a 9.4/10 for student growth, while Kim edges it at 9.8/10. Anton's strong growth score signals that students are making real gains from where they start, even if absolute proficiency levels trail Kim's.

Both schools serve similar-sized student bodies — William R. Anton Elementary enrolls 456 students, Charles H. Kim Elementary enrolls 472 — so neither offers a dramatically different campus scale. The free and reduced-price lunch rate at Anton is 95%, compared to 88% at Kim, indicating Anton serves a higher concentration of economically disadvantaged families. Kim's student-teacher ratio of 18.2:1 is modestly lower than Anton's 19.8:1, meaning slightly more individual attention per student on average.

One structural difference parents should weigh: William R. Anton Elementary serves grades KG through 6, while Charles H. Kim Elementary tops out at grade 5. Families at Kim will need to plan a middle school transition one year earlier than those at Anton. Both schools are Los Angeles elementary schools separated by 7.5 miles, so proximity will factor into the decision for families who don't have flexibility in either direction.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

William R. Anton Elementary

William R. Anton Elementary suits families in communities with higher economic need who want a school with exceptional student growth — its 9.4/10 growth score shows strong academic momentum relative to starting points. Parents who also want a KG–6 school, avoiding an early middle school transition, will find Anton's grade span an advantage over Kim.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary is the stronger fit for families prioritizing raw academic achievement and state-level standing — a 9.5/10 academic score and a #9 statewide rank are difficult to match anywhere in California. Parents who want the highest absolute proficiency ceiling for their child and can manage a grade 5 cutoff should choose Kim.

More Comparisons