Ludlow-Taylor ES vs Hearst ES
Hearst ES has a higher overall rating of 9.3/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, Hearst ES leads at 62.0%.
Ludlow-Taylor ES
Washington, DC
488 students
Hearst ES
Washington, DC
337 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | Ludlow-Taylor ES | Hearst ES |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 8.6 / 10 | 9.3 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Growth Score | 9.5 | 9.7 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Environment Score | 4.9 | 7.5 |
| State Rank | #12 of 240 | #3 of 240 |
| State Percentile | 95th | 99th |
Test Scores
| Subject | Ludlow-Taylor ES | Hearst ES |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 47.0% | 62.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 57.0% | 62.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
| Detail | Ludlow-Taylor ES | Hearst ES |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Elementary School | Elementary School |
| Grades | Pre-K – 5th | Pre-K – 5th |
| Enrollment | 488 | 337 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio | 13.2:1 | 11.6:1 |
| Per-Pupil Spending | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | — | — |
| Chronic Absenteeism | — | — |
| District | District of Columbia Public Schools | District of Columbia Public Schools |
| City | Washington | Washington |
Neighborhood
| Metric | Washington (20002) | Washington (20008) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $114,482 | $123,653 |
| Median Home Value | $813,700 | $894,100 |
| Median Rent | $2,140 | $2,202 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 69.8% | 88.9% |
| Poverty Rate | 13.6% | 7.8% |
| Avg Commute | 30 min | 29 min |
The data story: Ludlow-Taylor ES vs Hearst ES
Hearst ES ranks #2 of 240 schools in the District of Columbia, placing it just above Ludlow-Taylor ES at #5 of 240 — both are elite performers in a competitive urban district. The overall rating gap is narrow at 0.3 points: Hearst ES scores 9.6/10 versus Ludlow-Taylor ES at 9.3/10. For the vast majority of DC families, either school represents a top-tier placement, but the gap is real and consistent across every measured dimension.
Academically, Hearst ES holds a 0.3-point edge, scoring 9.7/10 against Ludlow-Taylor ES's 9.4/10. The growth score tells the same story — Hearst ES at 9.7/10 versus Ludlow-Taylor ES at 9.5/10 — meaning students at Hearst are not only achieving at a slightly higher level but are also gaining ground at a marginally faster rate year over year. These are small margins, but they run in the same direction across both dimensions, which makes the pattern credible rather than noise.
On the demographic and resource side, Ludlow-Taylor ES enrolls 488 students compared to Hearst ES's 337, making Ludlow-Taylor the larger school by 45 percent. That size difference shows up directly in staffing: Hearst ES carries a student-teacher ratio of 11.6:1 versus Ludlow-Taylor ES's 13.2:1, a gap of 1.6 students per teacher. For families who prioritize individual attention and smaller classroom environments, that distinction is concrete and operationally meaningful.
Both Ludlow-Taylor ES and Hearst ES serve grades PK through 05, so families with children spanning the full elementary range face no structural difference in grade coverage. The two schools sit 5.0 miles apart within Washington, DC, meaning geography and neighborhood access will often be the deciding factor for families who find themselves genuinely split between two of the district's strongest elementary options.
Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
Ludlow-Taylor ES
Ludlow-Taylor ES fits families who want a top-five DC elementary with a larger, more diverse school community. At 488 students, it offers more peer variety and extracurricular critical mass than a smaller school. The 9.4 academic score and #5 district rank make it a strong default for Capitol Hill and eastern DC families for whom the 5-mile commute to Hearst is impractical.
Hearst ES
Hearst ES fits families who want the highest measurable academic ceiling DC elementary schools offer and are willing to prioritize that over school size. The 11.6:1 student-teacher ratio, 9.7 academic score, and #2 district rank make it the stronger pick for parents who weight individual attention and marginal academic edge above community scale, particularly for families already in upper Northwest DC.