Skip to main content

Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts vs Orrington Elem School

Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts and Orrington Elem School are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.2 out of 10. In math proficiency, Orrington Elem School leads at 67.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts Orrington Elem School
Overall Rating 9.2 / 10 9.1 / 10
Academic Score 8.4 9.8
Growth Score 9.4 8.4
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 50.4% 22.1%
Environment Score 9.9 9.9
State Rank #58 of 3,813 #75 of 3,813
State Percentile 99th 98th

Test Scores

Subject Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts Orrington Elem School
Math Proficiency 34.0% 67.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 35.0% 57.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts Orrington Elem School
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 8th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 367 244
Student-Teacher Ratio 7.2:1 11.1:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 50.4% 22.1%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Evanston CCSD 65 Evanston CCSD 65
City Evanston Evanston

Neighborhood

Metric Evanston (60201) Evanston (60201)
Median Household Income $92,101 $92,101
Median Home Value $577,800 $577,800
Median Rent $1,792 $1,792
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 73.9% 73.9%
Poverty Rate 14.2% 14.2%
Avg Commute 27 min 27 min

The data story: Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts vs Orrington Elem School

Dr. ML King Jr. Literary & Fine Arts School and Orrington Elementary School sit 2.1 miles apart in Evanston, Illinois, and rank among the top 2% of all schools statewide — King at #58 of 3,813 and Orrington at #75 of 3,813. Their overall ratings are separated by a single tenth of a point (9.2 vs. 9.1), making this one of the tightest head-to-head comparisons a parent can face in the district.

The academic profiles pull in opposite directions. Orrington posts a 9.8/10 academic score versus King's 8.4 — a 1.4-point gap that reflects notably stronger proficiency on standardized measures. King offsets this with a significantly higher growth score: 9.4/10 compared to Orrington's 8.4, meaning students at King are advancing at a faster rate relative to their starting points. Parents weighing raw achievement against learning trajectory will find a genuine trade-off here rather than a clear winner.

The two schools serve meaningfully different populations. King enrolls 367 students with 50% qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch; Orrington serves 244 students with 22% on FRL. King's student-teacher ratio of 7.2:1 is substantially lower than Orrington's 11.1:1 — nearly four additional students per teacher — which translates to more individualized attention per child regardless of class composition. King's higher FRL rate also signals a more economically diverse environment, which some families actively seek for their children.

Grade span is a practical differentiator worth planning around. Dr. ML King Jr. Literary & Fine Arts serves kindergarten through 8th grade, giving enrolled families a single-school path through elementary and middle school. Orrington covers only kindergarten through 5th grade, meaning families will need to identify and transition to a separate middle school after fifth grade. For families with younger children, King's extended grade range can simplify logistics considerably over an eight-year horizon.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts

Dr. ML King Jr. Literary & Fine Arts suits families who prioritize strong student growth, want a K–8 school that avoids a mid-childhood transition, and value a lower student-teacher ratio of 7.2:1. Its economically diverse enrollment (50% FRL) makes it a strong fit for parents who want their children learning alongside peers from varied backgrounds.

Orrington Elem School

Orrington Elementary suits families focused on peak academic proficiency — its 9.8/10 academic score is 1.4 points higher than King's — and who prefer a smaller, less economically stratified environment. Parents who already have a preferred middle school in mind will find Orrington's KG–5 structure a natural fit for that transition plan.

More Comparisons