Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts vs Walker Elem School
Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts has a higher overall rating of 9.0/10 compared to 6.9/10. In math proficiency, Walker Elem School leads at 52.0%.
Attendance data is under correction. A public school's existing Resources & Environment score and overall rating shown here may still reflect an unverified attendance input.
Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts
Evanston, IL
367 students
Walker Elem School
Evanston, IL
412 students
Keep or send this comparison
Send to my realtor
Open an email to my realtorRatings Comparison
| Metric | Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts | Walker Elem School |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 9.0 / 10 | 6.9 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Growth Score | 9.2 | 4.9 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 50.4% | 38.8% |
| Environment Score | 9.8 | 9.8 |
| State Rank | #154 of 3,814 | #1,506 of 3,814 |
| State Percentile | 96th | 61th |
Test Scores
| Subject | Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts | Walker Elem School |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 34.0% | 52.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 35.0% | 47.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
Neighborhood
| Metric | Evanston (60201) | Evanston (60203) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $92,101 | $162,208 |
| Median Home Value | $577,800 | $469,400 |
| Median Rent | $1,792 | $1,852 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 73.9% | 73.9% |
| Poverty Rate | 14.2% | 4.2% |
| Avg Commute | 27 min | 26 min |
The data story: Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts vs Walker Elem School
Dr. ML King Jr. Literary & Fine Arts edges Walker Elem School by 0.2 overall rating points — 9.2 versus 9.0 out of 10 — but the more meaningful distinction is in state rank: King sits at #74 of 3,813 Illinois schools while Walker lands at #113 of 3,813, a 39-spot gap in a field of nearly four thousand schools. Both are genuinely high-performing elementary schools in Evanston, separated by just 0.6 miles, yet they serve families in meaningfully different ways.
The academic and growth scores tell opposite stories. Walker Elem School outperforms on raw academic proficiency, scoring 9.4 out of 10 versus King's 8.4 — a full point higher. King flips that result on growth, scoring 9.4 to Walker's 8.5, meaning King is getting stronger year-over-year improvement out of its students relative to expectations. Families who prioritize where students currently score will lean Walker; families who value how fast students are progressing will lean King.
The student-teacher ratio at Dr. ML King Jr. Literary & Fine Arts is 7.2 students per teacher, compared to 12.9 at Walker Elem School — nearly half the classroom density. King also serves a higher share of economically disadvantaged students, with 50% of enrollment qualifying for free or reduced lunch versus 39% at Walker. King's enrollment of 367 is modestly smaller than Walker's 412 students.
The grade configuration creates a structural fork in the road: Dr. ML King Jr. Literary & Fine Arts runs from kindergarten through eighth grade, while Walker Elem School serves kindergarten through fifth only. A King family stays put through middle school; a Walker family will need to identify a separate middle school placement after fifth grade. King's literary and fine arts designation also signals a programmatic identity — an intentional curriculum emphasis — rather than a general-education model.
Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
Dr ML King Jr Literary&Fine Arts
Dr. ML King Jr. Literary & Fine Arts suits families who want a single-school K–8 pathway, value lower classroom ratios (7.2:1), and prioritize student growth trajectory over current proficiency benchmarks. Its fine arts and literacy focus makes it the stronger fit for kids with creative or language-arts strengths.
Walker Elem School
Walker Elem School fits families who want the highest raw academic proficiency scores in a traditional K–5 setting and are comfortable planning a middle school transition after fifth grade. Its 9.4 academic score and slightly lower economic disadvantage index may signal a peer environment that skews toward high prior achievement.