Skip to main content

Field Elementary School vs Woodland

Field Elementary School and Woodland are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.1 out of 10. In math proficiency, Field Elementary School leads at 79.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Field Elementary School Woodland
Overall Rating 9.1 / 10 9.1 / 10
Academic Score 9.2 10.0
Growth Score 9.0 8.7
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 0% 0%
Environment Score 9.1 8.9
State Rank #47 of 1,791 #48 of 1,791
State Percentile 97th 97th

Test Scores

Subject Field Elementary School Woodland
Math Proficiency 79.0% 77.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 79.0% 87.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Field Elementary School Woodland
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades 4th – 5th Pre-K – 3rd
Enrollment 304 324
Student-Teacher Ratio 13.2:1 13.5:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch
Chronic Absenteeism
District Weston Weston
City Weston Weston

Neighborhood

Metric Weston (02493) Weston (02493)
Median Household Income $250,001 $250,001
Median Home Value $1,586,100 $1,586,100
Median Rent $2,168 $2,168
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 84.4% 84.4%
Poverty Rate 4.3% 4.3%
Avg Commute 27 min 27 min

The data story: Field Elementary School vs Woodland

Field Elementary School and Woodland sit just 0.2 miles apart in Weston, Massachusetts and land in virtually the same tier — both earn an overall rating of 9.1/10, with Field ranking #47 of 1791 Massachusetts schools and Woodland one step behind at #48 of 1791. For parents choosing between them, the overall scores are a near-wash; the meaningful differences live in the subscores and grade structure.

On academics, Woodland pulls ahead with a 10.0/10 academic score compared to Field Elementary School's 9.2/10 — a gap of 0.8 points that reflects measurably stronger proficiency results for the grades Woodland serves. Field Elementary School counters with a higher growth score: 9.0/10 versus Woodland's 8.7/10, meaning students at Field are advancing faster relative to their starting points, even if Woodland's absolute proficiency ceiling is higher. Neither advantage is trivial — depending on whether a family prioritizes where a child lands or how fast they climb, these two numbers point in opposite directions.

Both schools operate in a district that keeps class sizes tight, but Field Elementary School edges out Woodland slightly on student-teacher ratio: 13.2:1 against Woodland's 13.5:1. Enrollment is comparable — 304 students at Field Elementary School versus 324 at Woodland — so neither school is dramatically larger or more intimate than the other. The demographic and resource profile is effectively equivalent across both campuses.

The most concrete structural difference is grade configuration. Woodland serves prekindergarten through grade 3, while Field Elementary School covers grades 4 and 5 only. In Weston's feeder model, families with younger children will attend Woodland first, then transition to Field Elementary School for upper elementary. A family with a PK–kindergarten-age child has no real choice to make — Woodland is the school; Field Elementary School becomes relevant two or three years later. Families with children entering grades 4 or 5 are entering Field Elementary School's two-year window regardless of which lower school their child attended previously.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Field Elementary School

Field Elementary School suits families whose children are entering grades 4 or 5 and where academic growth trajectory matters as much as raw proficiency — its 9.0/10 growth score beats Woodland's 8.7/10, suggesting students are making strong forward progress in those upper elementary years. It's also the natural next step for any child who attended Woodland.

Woodland

Woodland is the starting point for most Weston families — it's the only option for prekindergarten through grade 3 in this part of the district. Its 10.0/10 academic score makes it an especially strong landing spot for families prioritizing high absolute proficiency levels from the earliest grades.

More Comparisons